国内九零后城市大学生与九零后乡村农民工生育观跨文化对比研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 02:25

本文选题：生育价值观 + 城市大学生　；参考：《上海外国语大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国近几年生育政策的调整,特别是2016年全面放开二胎政策的出台,生育观研究的重要性日益凸显。国内外研究大多从社会学和人口学角度出发,一般针对某一个社会群体,从跨文化角度对两个社会群体的生育观进行比较研究较为少见。本文以张进辅等人提出的生育价值观的理论构建以及Triandis的亚文化理论为研究框架,对城市出生和成长的九零后大学生和农村出生和成长的九零后农民工进行深度访谈,找出两者生育观取向的异同,以及这些异同背后两种亚文化之间相互作用的机理。本文采用半结构访谈法,从24位受访者获得数据加以分析。访谈提纲是在借鉴张进辅等人提出的生育价值观结构图的基础上获得的。研究结果表明,九零后城市大学生和九零后乡村农民工的生育价值观在生育时间,性别偏好,生育条件,生育价值,对待性教育的态度,对待收养的态度等六个方面存在差异,而在生育愿望,生育数量,生育责任和生育方式等四个方面存在共性。在生育时间上,九零后城市大学生普遍晚于九零后农民工;在性别偏好上,有重男轻女思想的九零后农民工要明显多于九零后城市大学生;在生育条件上,九零后城市大学生强调在生小孩之前要做好在经济上身体上心理上等各方面的准备,而九零后农民工觉得在生小孩之前不需要做太多准备;在生育价值上,大部分九零后城市大学生觉得生小孩是为了体验不同的人生阶段,而大部分九零后农民工觉得生小孩是为了传宗接代,对长辈表示孝顺;在性教育态度上,大部分九零后城市大学生觉得性教育对孩子的健康成长非常必要,而九零后农民工觉得性教育是父母和孩子之间一个非常尴尬的话题;在收养小孩的态度上,大部分九零后城市大学生可以接受收养小孩,而九零后农民工普遍更看重血缘关系,不能接受收养。从Triandis的亚文化理论出发,作者从城市文化和农村文化的角度剖析了这两个社会群体生育观存在异同的原因。基于城市和农村之间的流动性,本文指出了这两种亚文化之间的跨文化的互交动力,如乡村农民工也会受到城市文化的影响。
[Abstract]:With the adjustment of fertility policy in China in recent years, especially the release of the policy of fully liberalizing the second child in 2016, the importance of the research on fertility concept has become increasingly prominent. Most of the studies at home and abroad are based on sociology and demography. Generally speaking, it is rare to compare the fertility views of two social groups from the perspective of cross-culture and a certain social group. Based on the theoretical construction of fertility values put forward by Zhang Jinfu and Triandis's sub-culture theory, this paper conducts in-depth interviews with post-90s college students born and growing up in urban areas and migrant workers born and raised in rural areas. Find out the similarities and differences of the orientation of the two fertility views and the mechanism of interaction between the two subcultures behind these similarities and differences. The data obtained from 24 interviewees were analyzed by semi-structured interviews. The outline of the interview was obtained on the basis of the structure chart of fertility values proposed by Zhang Jinfu and others. The results show that the fertility values of urban college students and rural migrant workers after 1990 are different in six aspects, such as reproductive time, gender preference, fertility condition, fertility value, attitude towards sex education, attitude towards adoption, etc. But in the fertility desire, the fertility quantity, the fertility responsibility and the fertility way and so on four aspects has the commonness. In terms of childbearing time, urban college students are generally later than post-90 migrant workers in terms of their sex preference. In terms of gender preference, the number of post-90s migrant workers who have a preference for boys over women is obviously higher than that of post-1990 urban college students. In terms of fertility conditions, After 90, urban college students stressed that they should be prepared financially, physically, and psychologically before giving birth, while after 90, migrant workers felt that they did not need to do much preparation before giving birth; in terms of fertility value, Most post-1990 urban college students feel that the purpose of having children is to experience different stages of life, while most of the post-90s migrant workers feel that they are having children in order to be filial and filial to their elders. In terms of their attitude towards sex education, Most post-1990 urban college students feel that sex education is very necessary for the healthy growth of their children, while the post-90s migrant workers feel that sex education is a very awkward topic between parents and children; in terms of the attitude towards the adoption of children, Most post-1990 urban college students can accept the adoption of children, but the post-90s migrant workers generally attach more importance to consanguinity and cannot accept adoption. Based on Triandis's theory of subculture, the author analyzes the reasons for the similarities and differences between the two social groups' conception of fertility from the point of view of urban culture and rural culture. Based on the mobility between urban and rural areas, this paper points out the cross-cultural interaction between the two subcultures, such as rural migrant workers will also be affected by urban culture.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C924.21

【参考文献】