四川丰都非鬼城酆都考

发布时间：2018-03-10 00:24

本文选题：孭都　切入点：酆都　出处：《三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本为道教胜地的四川丰都(今属重庆市)后来却以"鬼国之都"而闻名,其成因一直是众说纷纭,莫衷一是。以往文献记载揭示了汉代道家方士王方平、阴长生合称被讹传为"阴间之王",丰都地名演变导致文献传抄讹误等原因,但一些论据仍缺乏史料证实。要澄清这一历史误会,需要梳理有关史料中对于实有地名"酆都"与传说中的鬼城"酆都"的记载及其相互关联。对照考察文献资料可知:其一,"阴、王"连读误为"阴间之王"之说并无实证;其二,传说中的鬼城"酆都"本是虚指,并无实地,后世讹传和附会为实有地名"酆都";其三,明洪武十四年,"孭都"更名"酆都"。这一政府行为使"鬼城就在四川酆都"的讹传基本被坐实。此后诸多文学作品都把传说中的"酆都"认定为实有地名之"酆都"。
[Abstract]:Sichuan Fengdu (now Chongqing), which was a Taoist resort, was later famous for its "ghost capital", which was caused by divergent opinions and different opinions. Previous literature records revealed Wang Fangping, a Taoist scholar in the Han Dynasty. Yin-Changsheng was falsely referred to as the "King of Hades", and the evolution of Fengdu place names led to the error of literature transmission, but some of the arguments are still lack of historical data to prove. To clarify this historical misunderstanding, It is necessary to sort out the records of the actual place names "Feng du" and the legendary ghost city "Feng du" in the relevant historical materials and their interrelation. Comparing with the literature, we can see: first, there is no evidence that "Yin, Wang" has been misread as "King of Hades"; Second, the legendary ghost city "Feng du" is originally a virtual reference, and there is no field, and later generations of false biography and attachment will be a real place name "Feng du"; third, In 14 years of Ming Hongwu, the name "Feng du" was changed to "Feng du". This government action made the false rumor that "ghost city is in Fengdu, Sichuan" basically taken up. Since then, many literary works have recognized the legendary "Feng du" as the "Feng du" of real place names.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院图书馆古籍特藏部;
【分类号】：K928.6

【参考文献】