秦南海郡辖南海县说商榷

发布时间：2018-05-29 05:57

本文选题：秦代 + 南越国　；参考：《中国历史地理论丛》2010年04期

【摘要】：本文通过对传世古官印"南海司空"之性质和新出土南越国木简所见"南海"地名之性质的重新研究,对秦南海郡辖有南海县说进行了商榷,认为所谓传世秦官印"南海司空"估计是南越国官印的误断,南越国木简所见"南海"地名指的当是南越国的南海郡,也不能排除是指南海郡治(即南越国都番禺城)的可能性,但没有任何证据可以证明指的是南海县,有学者推测秦代与南越国时期一样也设有南海县,显然缺乏立论的根基。
[Abstract]:Based on the re-study of the nature of the ancient official seal "the South China Sea Sikang" and the nature of the place names of the "South China Sea" seen by the newly unearthed South Yue wooden slips, this paper discusses the theory of Nanhai County under the jurisdiction of the Southern Sea County of the Qin Dynasty. It is believed that the so-called Qin Guanyin "South China Sea Sikang" was estimated to be a mistake in the official seal of South Vietnam. The place name of "South China Sea" as seen in the wooden slips of South Vietnam refers to the Nanhai County of South Vietnam. Nor can we rule out the possibility of Nanhai County (that is, Panyu City, the capital of South Vietnam), but there is no evidence to prove that it is Nanhai County. Some scholars speculate that there was Nanhai County in the Qin Dynasty as well as in the Southern Yue period, which obviously lacks the foundation of the argument.
【作者单位】：暨南大学历史系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(09YJA770021)
【分类号】：K928.6

【参考文献】