关于统万城历史的几个问题

发布时间：2018-06-19 02:03

本文选题：统万城 + 起讫时间　；参考：《中国历史地理论丛》2008年01期

【摘要】：本文对十六国时期匈奴夏国都统万城建造的起讫时间、统万城与汉奢延城、大城的关系、统万城的城制形态等相关的传统观点提出质疑。在重新解读文献的基础上,结合实地考察认为:一、统万城建设的起讫时间并不是一般认为的公元413年和419年,而是公元413年和424年;二、统万城既不是在十六国时期大城基础上兴建的,也不是在西汉上郡奢延县城的基础上兴建的,而是在汉朔方县所在地基础上兴建的;三、将统万城划分为宫城、皇城(内城)、外郭城三大块的做法显然是与中国古代都城制度发展史相违背,统万城筑造外郭城也不适宜于从事游牧的匈奴民族,至于现在东、西城外存在的不规则分布的夯土遗迹,东城之外的部分可能是在修筑统万城时未被加以利用的汉朔方城的残留遗迹,西城之外的部分疑为一处类似皇家园林的游猎场,或是战备马匹的圈养场。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author questions the time of completion of the construction of the Hun capital of Xiongnu, the relationship between the city of Tongwan and the city of the Han Dynasty, the relationship between the city and the city system, and the form of the city system of the city, and so on. On the basis of a reinterpretation of the literature, combined with a field study, it is concluded that: first, the starting time for the construction of the city was not 413 and 419, as generally thought, but 413 and 424; second, Tongwan City was neither built on the basis of the big cities in the 16th State period nor on the basis of the Heyan County in the Upper County of the Western Han Dynasty, but on the basis of the seat of Hanshuofang County. Third, the city of Tungwan was divided into Miyagi. The three big parts of the imperial city (the inner city and the outer Guo city) were obviously contrary to the history of the development of the ancient Chinese capital system, and the building of the outer city of Tongwan City was also not suitable for the nomadic Huns. As for the east now, The irregular distribution of rammed earth outside the west city, the part outside the east city may be the remains of the Han Shuo square city which was not used during the construction of Tungwan city, and the part outside the west city is suspected to be a game ground similar to the royal garden Or a garrison for horses.
【作者单位】：保山师范高等专科学校
【分类号】：K928.623.8

【参考文献】