二十余年来区域历史地理理论研究概述

发布时间：2018-11-04 13:03

【摘要】：正与西方的学术研究相比,中国的学术研究大多重实证而轻理论,这种现象在历史地理学界也同样存在。从建国以来中国历史地理的研究情况来看,虽然已经突破了传统沿革地理的藩篱,在各个专题领域取得了颇可称道的成绩与发展,但在理论探讨方面似乎一直存在着天然的缺陷。此等情势,直到"文化大革命"结束后才逐步有所改观。尤其是20世纪80年代中期以后,历史地理学理论的研讨呈现出蓬勃向上的发展势头,其重要的标志就是从1987年第1期起,《中国历史地理论丛》杂志分10次将日本学者菊地利夫的《历史地理学方法论》陆续翻译发表(该书翻译后称《历史地理学导论》,由辛德勇翻译)。在译文首次发表时,"编者案"云:"自三十年代顾颉刚先生创建禹贡学会起,特别是建国以来,中国历史地理各个专题领域的研究都取
[Abstract]:Compared with western academic research, Chinese academic research is more empirical than theoretical, and this phenomenon also exists in the field of historical geography. From the point of view of the study of Chinese historical geography since the founding of the people's Republic of China, although it has broken through the barriers of traditional historical geography, it has made commendable achievements and developments in various thematic fields. But in the aspect of theoretical discussion, there seems to be a natural defect all the time. This situation did not gradually change until the end of the Cultural Revolution. Especially since the mid-1980s, the research on the theory of historical geography has shown a vigorous development momentum, and its important symbol is the first issue of 1987. The Historical Geography of China was translated and published 10 times by the Japanese scholar Ju Di-lifu 's Historical Geography Methodology (later called the introduction of Historical Geography, translated by Sinde Yong). When the translation was first published, the Editor's case said: "since the 1930s when Mr. Gu Jiegang founded the Yugong Society, especially since the founding of the PRC, the studies in various thematic fields of Chinese historical geography have been taken into account."
【作者单位】：淮阴师范学院历史文化旅游学院;
【基金】：2012年度江苏省哲学社会科学基金项目(12LSD014)研究成果
【分类号】：K928.6

【相似文献】