东汉沅南县城故址考
发布时间：2018-12-11 00:55
【摘要】：东汉沅南县的设置距今已近二千年,当年该县城之故址何在?在《大清一统志》、光绪《桃源县志》、《读史方舆纪要》等古籍记载中,分别有不同说法,其中《大清一统志》的说法为近现代一些著述乃至工具书所采信。然而据《水经注》记载和其他史料考证,《大清一统志》的说法是错误的,光绪《桃源县志》亦误,唯《读史方舆纪要》之记载应为是。
[Abstract]:The establishment of Yuannan County in the Eastern Han Dynasty has been nearly two thousand years ago. What was the site of the county seat at that time? In the ancient books such as the Records of Unification of the Great Qing Dynasty, Guang Xu's Records of Taoyuan County, and the Summary of Shi Fangyu, there are different versions of the ancient books, among which, the version of "one Unification of the Great Qing Dynasty" has been accepted by some modern works and even reference books. However, according to the records of the Water Classics and other historical materials, it is wrong to say that the "Records of the Unification of the Great Qing Dynasty" is wrong, and Guang Xu's "Records of Taoyuan County" is also wrong, but the record of "Reading Shi Fangyu's minutes" should be.
【作者单位】： 湖南文理学院文史学院;
【分类号】：K928.6
，
本文编号：2371552
[Abstract]:The establishment of Yuannan County in the Eastern Han Dynasty has been nearly two thousand years ago. What was the site of the county seat at that time? In the ancient books such as the Records of Unification of the Great Qing Dynasty, Guang Xu's Records of Taoyuan County, and the Summary of Shi Fangyu, there are different versions of the ancient books, among which, the version of "one Unification of the Great Qing Dynasty" has been accepted by some modern works and even reference books. However, according to the records of the Water Classics and other historical materials, it is wrong to say that the "Records of the Unification of the Great Qing Dynasty" is wrong, and Guang Xu's "Records of Taoyuan County" is also wrong, but the record of "Reading Shi Fangyu's minutes" should be.
【作者单位】： 湖南文理学院文史学院;
【分类号】：K928.6
，
本文编号：2371552
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/renwendili/2371552.html
