地理学期刊与地理学的传统——西方主要国家地理学期刊评价
发布时间：2018-12-15 14:13
【摘要】：SCI是世界公认的自然科学领域最为权威的研究成果检索和评价工具,另一方面,一门学科的学会刊物也是反映该领域最重要研究成果的平台。在许多自然学科领域,学会会刊都是SCI的必检刊物,但世界各国多数地理学会的会刊却都不在SCI索引之列。这就产生了一个疑问:如何来评价地理学的研究成果?本文认为,地理学刊物的评价应该遵循其学科特点,以会刊作为成果评价的核心更符合实际。本文介绍了英美德法日等主要国家的地理学会和会刊的情况,并借此呼吁,在当前以SCI期刊论文作为第一标准的中国学术行政体制下,应维护地理学自身的发展规律,保持地理学的传统,建立合理的地理学研究成果评价体系。
[Abstract]:SCI is recognized as the most authoritative research achievement retrieval and evaluation tool in the field of natural science in the world. On the other hand, the academic journal of a subject is also the platform to reflect the most important research results in this field. In many fields of natural sciences, academic journals are required publications of SCI, but the journals of most geographical societies in the world are not included in the SCI index. This raises the question of how to evaluate the research results of geography. This paper holds that the evaluation of geographical journals should follow the characteristics of their disciplines, and that it is more practical to take the journal as the core of the evaluation of results. This paper introduces the geographical societies and journals of major countries, such as Britain, America, Germany, France and Japan, and calls for the maintenance of the development law of geography under the current Chinese academic administrative system, which regards SCI periodical papers as the first standard. Maintain the tradition of geography and establish a reasonable evaluation system of geographical research results.
【作者单位】： 中山大学地理科学与规划学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年项目(40701041) 教育部博士点基金项目(20070558072) 国家科技基础性工作专项项目(2007FY140800) 留学回国人员科研启动基金项目(4105315)
【分类号】：K901.4
本文编号：2380798
[Abstract]:SCI is recognized as the most authoritative research achievement retrieval and evaluation tool in the field of natural science in the world. On the other hand, the academic journal of a subject is also the platform to reflect the most important research results in this field. In many fields of natural sciences, academic journals are required publications of SCI, but the journals of most geographical societies in the world are not included in the SCI index. This raises the question of how to evaluate the research results of geography. This paper holds that the evaluation of geographical journals should follow the characteristics of their disciplines, and that it is more practical to take the journal as the core of the evaluation of results. This paper introduces the geographical societies and journals of major countries, such as Britain, America, Germany, France and Japan, and calls for the maintenance of the development law of geography under the current Chinese academic administrative system, which regards SCI periodical papers as the first standard. Maintain the tradition of geography and establish a reasonable evaluation system of geographical research results.
【作者单位】： 中山大学地理科学与规划学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年项目(40701041) 教育部博士点基金项目(20070558072) 国家科技基础性工作专项项目(2007FY140800) 留学回国人员科研启动基金项目(4105315)
【分类号】：K901.4
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 苗长虹;从区域地理学到新区域主义:20世纪西方地理学区域主义的发展脉络[J];经济地理;2005年05期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 刘则渊;梁永霞;;浅谈SCI的功能[A];第二届中国科技政策与管理学术研讨会暨科学学与科学计量学国际学术论坛2006年论文集[C];2006年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 何伟;区域城镇空间结构及优化研究[D];南京农业大学;2002年
2 孙相东;地缘政治学的性质：一种多维视角分析[D];中共中央党校;2003年
3 焦连成;经济地理学研究的传统对比[D];东北师范大学;2007年
4 潘晟;宋代地理学的观念、体系与知识兴趣[D];北京大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 沈妙芬;地域文化视野中的俞源民居壁画[D];中国艺术研究院;2008年
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 陆大道;中国地理学发展若干值得思考的问题[J];地理学报;2003年01期
2 保继刚,张骁鸣;1978年以来中国旅游地理学的检讨与反思[J];地理学报;2004年S1期
3 侯甬坚;日本《历史地理》杂志创刊初期的学科概念[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年04期
4 姜道章;日本历史地理学研究述评[J];中国历史地理论丛;2001年03期
，本文编号：2380798
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/renwendili/2380798.html
