陈渠珍与湘西自治（1921-1936）

  本文关键词：陈渠珍与湘西自治（1921-1936），由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

陈渠珍与湘西自治（1921-1936）

陈渠珍与湘西自治（1921-1936）

本文以发生在一九二零年代和三零年代湘西以地方军阀陈渠珍为主导的自治运动为谈论对象。首先依据相关的档案、陈渠珍的遗文以及湘西各县的文史资料,试图复原和重建湘西自治的史实,在此基础上就若干不足展开讨论。本文指出,由于这个时期的国家政权没有能力维持政治秩序,掌握社会权力的地方精英,乘机侵夺了国家合法权力；又由于民国以来的地方精英与国家权力之间的制度性联系管道已经丧失,其权力的传统合法性资源已经不复存在,为了消除其各种外在势力的威胁,加强其统治区内的凝聚力,他们从地方主义、民族主义和对现代化的追求等方面来为自身统治提供合法性依据,显示了现代中国政治权威多硕博在线论文网化的发展趋向。纵观那个年代的地方自治状况,地方军阀除了关心地盘的维持和军事实力的巩固以外,也存在着寻求一条挽救中国危机的道路的良好愿望和开启民智追求社会的文明和进步的良苦用心。湘西自治不是真正的近代意 义的民治。陈渠珍的地方自治虽然袭用了西方地方自治的名义和某些形式,但其精神内涵实际上仍是儒家的道德教化和社会伦理,体现了传统士大夫修齐治平的理想,与真正近代意 义上的人民自决自主和参政议政的“地方自治”有很大的区别。陈渠珍所处的时代,正是国家权威衰微不振的时代。这样的时代环境为统治一方的地方精英的出现提供了相对宽松的政治条件。但湘西自治是有限的相对自治,湘西自治是在军阀混战的复杂背景下开展的。湘西地方自治是近代中国从国家权威衰微向国家权威再建过渡的历史时期的产物。

【Abstract】 This thesis discusses the Xiangxi autonomy movement, led by the local warlords of Chen Quzhen in the 1920s and 1930s. It analyzes the relevant files, the legatary documents of Chen Quzhen and historical data of different counties of Xiangxi, tries to reconstruct and rebuilt the history of Xiangxi autonomy movement, and to discuss relevant issues.This thesis points out, on one hand, the state political power at that time was unable to maintain political order, therefore, the local elites which controlled the social power, took the opportunity to trespass the legitimate power of the state. On the other hand, since the founding of the Republic of China, the institutional contact between the elites and the state power had ceased, the traditional and legitimate resources of power had declined, the elites needed to strengthen the forces of their regency to eliminate the threat of other external forces. They relied on the localism, nationalism and modernism to provide legality for their reign. This shows the diversified development trend of the political authority of contemporary China.When examining the situation of autonomy of that period of time comprehensively, one can find that the local warlords not only care about the maintain of their own region, the strengthen of their military forces, but they also make the good wish and try their best to search a way to save the crisis of their country, to enlighten the masses of people and to develop and progress the civilization.The concept of the autonomy of Xiangxi is not the same as the contemporary sense, which means a place is governed by its people. The autonomy of Xinagxi led by Chen Quzhen, although took over the name and some forms from modern Western, the spiritual essence is still Confucian. That is, to educate and civilize people with morality and ethics, which embodies the ideal of the traditional scholar-bureaucrat, to cultivate oneself well helps to harmony a family, and only after that, a country can be stable and peaceful. Therefore, this conception is quite different from the contemporary sense of autonomy, which means people have the right to make decisions, participate in politics to govern a place.Chen Quzhen lived at the time when China was on the decline, the authority was at its weak point. The historical background provided relatively loose environment for the coming up of the elites. The range of Xiangxi autonomy was limited. It was carried out under the complex background of the warlord era. Therefore, it is the outcome of the contemporary China, which experienced the transition from authority decline to authority rebuilt.

更多论文推荐: 各专业论文 海量论文下载

  本文关键词：陈渠珍与湘西自治（1921-1936），，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。