悲剧的过去,适宜的传统:后苏联时代关于西乌克兰波兰遗产的思想论争

发布时间：2018-06-05 03:17

本文选题：乌克兰人 + 波兰人　；参考：《国际社会科学杂志(中文版)》2016年02期

【摘要】：本文所考察的,是出现于有关波乌边境地带难题重重的历史的公共争论中的思想观点,首先集中关注的是论争中乌克兰(首要的是西乌克兰)一方所发出的各种话语。由于服从以国家为中心的历史解释,但又是一个向多元用法开放的重要主题,波乌边境地带的历史多元性自21世纪头十年以来已成为西乌克兰思想再阐释的对象。按照多元文化传统建构这种知识资产,标志着乌克兰知识分子力图将地方性的(与此同时,也是跨国性的)历史镌刻成一种具有内在连贯性的国家叙事。然而事实证明,在此过程中,因为源于第二次世界大战和战后时期各种事件所留下的迄今未解决的记忆冲突,这种多元文化的"世界"(特别是波兰一方的"世界")正抵制着人们将此毫无缝隙地纳入以乌克兰为中心的历史叙述结构。
[Abstract]:This paper examines the ideas and viewpoints in the public debate on the difficult history of the border zone between Poland and Ukraine. The first focus is on the utterances issued by the Ukrainian side of the argument (above all the western Ukraine). Due to the historical interpretation centered on the state, but also an important subject open to the pluralistic usage, the historical pluralism of the border zone between Poland and Ukraine has become the object of reinterpretation of the thought of western Ukraine since the first decade of the 21st century. The construction of this intellectual asset according to the multicultural tradition symbolizes that Ukrainian intellectuals are trying to carve local (and transnational) history into a national narrative with internal coherence. It turns out, however, that in the process, as a result of the unresolved memory conflicts left behind by the events of the second World War and the post-war period, This multicultural "world", especially on the Polish side, is resisting its seamless inclusion in the Ukrainian-centric narrative of history.
【作者单位】：瑞典隆德大学语言文学研究中心和东欧研究中心;
【分类号】：D751.2;K512

【相似文献】