“始善终隙”:顾颉刚与胡适关系再审视

发布时间：2018-01-11 14:21

本文关键词：“始善终隙”:顾颉刚与胡适关系再审视　出处：《史学月刊》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：顾颉刚与胡适在学术上结缘,与当时中国学制转型密切相关。20世纪20年代前期,他们在学术事业上相得益彰。20世纪20年代后期,他们首先在治学理念上出现分歧,后才发生古史分歧。1930年前后,中国古史学、考古学的发展,造成了胡适古史观转变,使得二人发生了诸多古史分歧。但其中两次公开争辩,则带有各自的主观动机。1930年后,二人渐行渐远。其间,傅斯年的阴影和担心胡、顾关系破裂的危机感,始终困扰着顾颉刚。1949年分别时,疏远已成事实。在政治运动中,顾颉刚最初只为澄清"疏远"的事实,而随后的政治压力与学术思想的变化,则使他对胡适逐渐淡漠。但是,不能确知胡适由"善"转"隙"的原委,成了他晚年的一个心结。
[Abstract]:Gu Jiegang and Hu Shi had a close relationship with the academic system transformation of China at that time. In the early 20s of the 20th century, they complement each other in academic career. The latter period of 20s was the academic career of Gu Jiegang and Hu Shi. In 1930, the development of Chinese ancient historiography and archaeology resulted in the transformation of Hu Shi's view of ancient history. The two men had many differences in ancient history. But two public debates had their own subjective motives. After 1930, the two men moved away. In the meantime, Fu Sinian's shadow and fear Hu. In 1949, alienation became a fact. In the political movement, Gu Jiegang was originally only to clarify the fact of alienation. But the later political pressure and the change of academic thought made him gradually indifferent to Hu Shi. However, it was impossible to know for sure that Hu Shi had changed from "good" to "gap" and became a knot in his old age.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：K092
【正文快照】： 在20世纪中国史学史的书写中,学者多注重顾颉刚对胡适学术的承继与发展。为了凸显时代特征,展现中国史学整体演进脉络,而求胡、顾学术方法、观念之“同”,自是应当。但胡、顾交往并不限于一时,他们因对社会思潮、学术趋向反应不同而产生的“异”及其对彼此的影响,同样值得我们

【相似文献】