积极面对当今中国史学的多途发展

发布时间：2018-02-02 16:31

本文关键词： 中国史学史学科中国史学史研究比较研究史学研究多途研究对象外国历史史学理论发展中国学者　出处：《史学月刊》2012年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正近几年来,关于中国史学史研究如何深入,是一些同行十分关心的问题。有鉴于此,我趁着2011年参加一个学术研讨会的机会,写了一篇题为《试论中国史学史研究的新路向》的文章,发表于《天津社会科学》2012年第1期。我在此文中所说的"新路向":一是认为中国史学自古以来都有重视理论的传统,因此加强理论研究是第一个"新路向"。二是近几十年来,中国史学史多以史家或史书为主要研究对象,这是八十多年前梁启超提出来的。时至今日,这种研究模式仍有其存在的价值,尤其是对初学者来说,它仍然是起步阶段的"必修课"。但是,如果要从学术前沿的开拓与创新来看,似应把研究的重点转移到以问
[Abstract]:In recent years, some colleagues are very concerned about how to study the history of Chinese historiography. In view of this, I took the opportunity to attend an academic seminar in 2011. He wrote an article entitled "A New way to study the History of Chinese historiography". Published in the 2012 issue of Tianjin Social Sciences. The "new direction" I mentioned in this article: first, I think that Chinese historiography has a tradition of attaching importance to theory since ancient times. Therefore, strengthening theoretical research is the first "new direction". Second, in recent decades, historians or history books are the main research objects in the history of Chinese historiography, which was put forward by Liang Qichao more than 80 years ago. This kind of research mode still has its existence value, especially for beginners, it is still a "compulsory course" in the initial stage. However, if we want to explore and innovate from the front of the academic field. It may be appropriate to shift the focus of the study to questions
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092
【正文快照】： 近几年来,关于中国史学史研究如何深入,是一些同行十分关心的问题。有鉴于此,我趁着2011年参加一个学术研讨会的机会,写了一篇题为《试论中国史学史研究的新路向》的文章,发表于《天津社会科学》2012年第1期。我在此文中所说的“新路向”:一是认为中国史学自古以来都有重视理

【相似文献】