霍夫施塔特的史学观念与编纂实践

发布时间：2018-02-26 23:35

本文关键词： 霍夫施塔特史学认识论史学方法论编纂实践　出处：《史林》2012年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：美国哥伦比亚大学历史系已故教授理查德·霍夫施塔特的史学观念与其丰富的编纂实践相得益彰。他在史学认识上倾向于"当下性原则"和"重写论"的史学主张,并以彰显"反讽的共识"为主旨的政治文化史为研究范式,借此强化历史学的人文主义特性;在方法论原则上强调"视角论"与"史学史"的研究路数,以深化对历史重大问题的探究;在编纂实践中以理解和接受为理论预设,采取"叙述-分析的综合型"来描述和分析政治意识形态。上述认识论和方法论的提出及其在"反讽的共识"范式中的应用,是他对美国进步主义学派历史学家的一种反抗,也是对二战后美国"社会科学的"历史学的批判性反思,更是对历史学学科性质和社会功能的深度思考,以及对未来历史编纂趋势的一种展望。
[Abstract]:Richard Hofstadt, a late professor of history at Columbia University in the United States, had a very good idea of historiography and his rich compilation practice. He was inclined to the historical ideas of "present principles" and "rewriting" in his understanding of history. In order to strengthen the humanism characteristic of history, the political culture history, which shows "the consensus of irony" as the research paradigm, emphasizes the number of research ways of "angle of view" and "history of historiography" in methodology principle, and take the political and cultural history as the research paradigm to strengthen the humanism characteristic of the history of history. In order to deepen the exploration of the major historical problems, to understand and accept as the theoretical presupposition in the compilation practice, The introduction of epistemology and methodology and its application in the paradigm of "ironic consensus" are his resistance to American progressive historians. It is also a critical reflection on the history of "social sciences" in the United States after World War II. It is also a deep reflection on the nature and social function of history and a prospect of the trend of historical compilation in the future.
【作者单位】：东华大学人文学院历史研究所;东华大学人文学院;
【基金】：2010年教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“霍夫施塔特史学研究”(10YJC770006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K097.12

【参考文献】