《资治通鉴纲目》作者问题新探

发布时间：2018-03-03 09:57

本文选题：《资治通鉴纲目》　切入点：朱熹　出处：《史学史研究》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：赵师渊入朱门不早于淳熙八年,并未参与《资治通鉴纲目》初稿的编修,而是在朱熹晚年时,帮助其师"整顿"《纲目》,并至少承担了汉、唐部分的修订。"赵师渊作目"最初因王柏对史料的误读而起。元、明时期《纲目》成为史学义理取向的典范后,"赵师渊作目"作为一种可资利用的叙述策略,在阐释《纲目》书法的论说中得到凸显。明中期以后,信奉治史实证路径的文人群体宣扬《纲目》出自赵师渊之手,以此消解《纲目》在史学义理维度的典范意义。而无论是"赵师渊作目"或"赵师渊撰《纲目》",其载体是关涉《纲目》阅读、阐发、评价、接受等性质的文本。在此类文本中,虽然"赵师渊作目"说的表象是一致的,但其背后蕴含的史学观念在明中期发生了翻转,从阐释经典转为解构典范,由宋学取向转为汉学立场。
[Abstract]:No sooner than eight years before Chun-hee, Zhao Shiyuan did not participate in the compilation and revision of the first draft of the first draft of the Compendium of Zi Zhi Tong. Instead, in his later years, he helped his teacher "rectify" the "Compendium" and at least undertook the Han Dynasty. The revision of the Tang Dynasty part. Zhao Shiyuan's works first arose from Wang Bai's misreading of historical materials. After the Yuan Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty, "Zhao Shiyuan's works" became a model of historical justice orientation, "Zhao Shiyuan's works" was regarded as a kind of narrative strategy that could be used. After the middle of Ming Dynasty, the literati who believed in the path of empirical study of history advocated "programmatic" from Zhao Shiyuan's hand. In this way, the canonical significance of "programmatic" in the dimension of historical justice is dispelled. Whether it is "Zhao Shiyuan as a subject" or "Zhao Shiyuan's compilation of", its carrier is a text of the nature of reading, elucidating, evaluating, accepting, etc. In this kind of text, Although the representation of Zhao Shiyuan as a subject is consistent, the historical concept behind it was reversed in the middle of Ming Dynasty, from the interpretation of classics to the deconstruction model, and from the orientation of Song to the position of Sinology.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】