论口述历史证据可靠性的言语记录本位

发布时间：2018-03-03 04:01

本文选题：口述历史　切入点：证据理论　出处：《当代电影》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在既往的口述史学理论研究中,针对口述历史可靠性受到质疑时通常采取强调一切材料主观性的相对主义辩护策略而缺乏理论建构,甚至产生严重的社会后果。系统的口述历史证据理论对于口述史学理论建构具有重要意义,无论是对于档案型口述历史还是社会历史型口述历史而言都是如此,进而弥合两者之间的分歧。言语记录本位是作为这一证据理论的起点和核心,同时明确口述历史证据与其他史料证据,特别是一般档案证据之间异同的实质。本文初步从记录与前提、记录与事件、记录与历史烙印、记录与言语、记录与纪录等多个维度阐述言语记录本位的内涵,进一步阐述了言语与言语记录可靠性多个方面的层次性:目标史实的转述层次、表层语义与深层语义、文字档案言语与口述言语、有意识的言语表达与无意识的言语表达、存档的言语表达与大众传播的言语表达。
[Abstract]:In the previous research of oral history theory, when the reliability of oral history is questioned, the relativist defense strategy which emphasizes the subjectivity of all materials is usually adopted, but the theoretical construction is lacking. The systematic theory of oral historical evidence is of great significance to the construction of oral history theory, both for archival oral history and social historical oral history. As the starting point and core of the evidence theory, the oral historical evidence and other historical evidence are clearly defined. In particular, the essence of the similarities and differences between general archival evidence. This paper expounds the connotation of speech recording from the aspects of record and premise, record and event, record and historical imprint, record and speech, record and record, etc. Furthermore, this paper expounds the levels of reliability of speech and speech recording in many aspects: the reporting level of the historical facts of the target, the surface and deep semantics, the written file speech and the oral speech, the conscious speech expression and the unconscious speech expression. Archived speech expression and mass communication speech expression.
【作者单位】：中国电影艺术研究中心;
【分类号】：K0

【参考文献】