《左传》《国语》被刘歆窜乱的一项铁证——历史年代学家刘坦之说申论

发布时间：2018-03-10 15:48

本文选题：《左传》　切入点：星次　出处：《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《左传》是否被刘歆伪造或窜乱,争议极大,涉及《国语》一书。运用历史年代学家刘坦对星岁纪年的研究成果,分析《左传》《国语》内出现的岁星纪事,可以找到刘歆窜乱二书的铁证。刘歆《三统历》制定了十二星次的新名称体系,是此前各种书籍文献所无,《史记·天官书》仍采用先秦石氏"星经"的名称,即为明证。而新的"星纪"、"大梁"等十二次名目,其思路和来源,只有刘歆才可能设定,他出于构建新学术体系之目的,加之政治投机需要,遂采取书籍文献上作伪、掺假的行为,结果身败名裂,这是学术史上的一大教训。
[Abstract]:Whether or not Zuo Zhuan was falsified or disorderly by Liu Xin is a matter of great controversy, and involves the book "Mandarin". Using the research results of the chronologist Liu Tan on the years of the Star, this paper analyzes the chronology of the stars appearing in "Zuo Zhuan" and "Guoyu". We can find the ironclad evidence of Liu Xin's two books. Liu Xin's "three unified calendars" formulated a new name system of 12 stars, which was not found in all previous books and documents. "Shi Ji 路Tian Guan Shu" still adopts the name of "Star Classic" of Shi Shi in the pre-Qin period. That is to say, it is clear proof. And the new "Star period", "Daliang" and so on 12 times, its thought and the origin, only Liu Xin may set up, he for the purpose of constructing the new academic system, coupled with the political speculation need, therefore adopts the books and the literature to make false, Adulteration results in disrepute, which is a great lesson in academic history.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;内蒙古师范大学科学技术史研究院;
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】