是的,历史就是被制度决定的——答孙、樊二位先生的商榷

发布时间：2018-03-31 00:14

  本文选题：制度　切入点：历史　出处：《湖北社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：《历史是被什么决定的》一文提出历史决定论之后,很快引来一些文章的质疑。其中的质疑焦点,主要集中在方法论、制度化社会赏罚与人们活动的关系、制度与生产力的关系和制度的来源这四个方面。尽管这些批判性的质疑都有自己的理据,但经逐一分析后,还都不能对我的这套观点形成有效威胁。不仅如此,它们还等于又从反面帮我证明了:历史就是被制度决定的。
[Abstract]:After the historical determinism was put forward in the article "History is determined by what", some articles soon questioned it. The focus of questioning was mainly on methodology, the relationship between institutionalized social rewards and punishments and people's activities. The relationship between the system and the productive forces and the origin of the system. Although all these critical questions have their own grounds, after analyzing them one by one, none of them can pose an effective threat to this set of views of mine. They also help me prove that history is determined by the system.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学哲学系;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研研究费项目“历史规律研究”(2017) 国家教育部人文社会科学一般项目“制度在社会历史中的地位与作用”(14YJA720002)
【分类号】：K01
，

本文编号：1688286