当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 史学理论论文 >

散论多元史观——历史哲学散步

发布时间:2018-04-03 05:08

  本文选题:布克哈特 切入点:海登·怀特 出处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2010年05期


【摘要】:西方史学和历史哲学的革命,都源于打破史学研究定于"独尊"的僵化和求索历史本真的理想。多元化带来的创新乃是这种革命的手段。西方肇始于古希腊的实质主义和科学主义对于其史观的深远影响,使史学难觅历史本真而长期停滞于历史的外壳。所谓史学革命,文中提到19世纪末至20世纪以降的诸家,都是尽力摆脱实质主义和科学主义视野的束缚,而诉诸新的哲学视野。其目的,就在于探索能深入历史本真的历史观或历史思维。
[Abstract]:The revolution of western historiography and historical philosophy originates from the inflexibility of historical research and the ideal of seeking historical truth.The innovation brought about by pluralism is the means of this revolution.Western essentialism and scientism, which began in ancient Greece, had a profound influence on its historical view, which made historiography difficult to find the historical truth and stagnant in the shell of history for a long time.The so-called historiography revolution, mentioned in the paper from the end of the 19th century to the 20th century, is to try to get rid of the shackles of the view of substance and scientism and to resort to a new philosophical field of vision.Its purpose, is to explore the historical view or historical thinking that can go deep into history.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;中华外国哲学史学会;
【分类号】:K0

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王树人;;散论多元史观——历史哲学散步[J];中国社会科学院研究生院学报;2010年05期

2 陈雅s,

本文编号:1703743


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/1703743.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4b216***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com