中国史学史学科发展与中外史学比较

发布时间：2018-04-17 05:19

本文选题：中国史学史学科 + 中国史学史研究　；参考：《史学月刊》2012年08期

【摘要】：正一中国史学史研究面临的瓶颈中国史学史作为一个相对独立的史学分支学科,其产生如果从梁启超等人于20世纪20年代的倡导算起,也已有约90年的发展历程,其间虽有起伏、周折,但总的趋向是学术水平逐步深入,研究范围愈加广泛,学术成果的丰富已经引人注目,学术队伍的扩展也十分可观,于今已经呈现出前所未有的繁荣景象。然而中国史学史是比较特殊的学科,正面临发展的一个瓶颈,对此应当有清醒的估量,以做好应对和开拓新的学术增长点。中国史学史研究在学术上难度较大,简单地介绍史家、史书固为容易,但要深入研讨史家的
[Abstract]:As a relatively independent branch of historiography, the history of Chinese historiography, as a relatively independent branch of historiography, has been developed for about 90 years since Liang Qichao and others initiated it in the 1920s.Although there have been ups and downs and twists and turns, the general trend is that the academic level has gradually deepened, the scope of research has become more extensive, the richness of academic achievements has attracted attention, and the expansion of the academic team has also been considerable.Today it has shown unprecedented prosperity.However, the history of Chinese historiography is a special subject, which is facing a bottleneck of development. It should be soberly evaluated in order to deal with it and open up new academic growth points.The study of the history of Chinese historiography is of great academic difficulty. It is easy to introduce historians simply, but it is easy to study the history books deeply.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“中外史学理论比较研究”(项目批号:04JZD0027)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】