当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 史学理论论文 >

中国古史分期流派新探

发布时间:2018-04-26 02:38

  本文选题:官吏阶级 + 庶民阶级 ; 参考:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期


【摘要】:中国古史分期的主要流派——西周封建说和战国封建说以及魏晋封建说——争议的核心是奴隶社会与封建社会的分期,因而其根本谬误,乃在于皆以为奴隶社会是中国历史发展必经阶段。殊不知,奴隶社会和封建社会都不是一个国家发展的必经阶段。只不过,在没有外来社会介入或影响的条件下,任何国家都只可能跨越其一而不可能全部跨越;究竟跨越奴隶社会还是封建社会,完全是偶然的可选择的依人的意志而转移的:这就是五千年来中国有奴隶制却没有奴隶社会的客观原因。中国之所以会选择封建社会而跨越奴隶社会,是因为选择者无疑是全权垄断强大无比的官吏阶级,而不可能是全权丧失软弱无力的庶民阶级。官吏阶级所选择和追求的势必是对官吏阶级最有利的社会,亦即以生产资料官有制的封建制为主导——而伴之以官有制的资本主义和奴隶制——的官农奴制封建社会:这就是五千年来中国有奴隶制却没有奴隶社会的主观原因。
[Abstract]:The core of the controversy between the Western Zhou Dynasty feudal theory and warring States feudal theory and Wei Jin feudal theory is the division of slave society and feudal society, so its fundamental fallacy is that the ancient history of China is divided into two major schools: the Western Zhou Dynasty and the warring States period. It is believed that slave society is a necessary stage in the development of Chinese history. However, slave society and feudal society are not a necessary stage of national development. But, without the intervention or influence of foreign societies, no country can span but not all of them: whether it is a slave society or a feudal society, This is the objective reason why China has had slavery but no slave society for five thousand years. The reason why China chose the feudal society to cross the slave society was because the elector was undoubtedly a powerful and powerful official class, rather than the ordinary people class. What the official class chooses and pursues is bound to be the most advantageous society for the official class. That is, the feudal system dominated by the official system of means of production-and accompanied by the official system of capitalism and slavery-the feudal society of official serfdom: this is the subjective reason why there has been slavery but no slave society in China for five thousand years.
【作者单位】: 北京大学哲学系;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金一般项目“社会主义核心价值观与国家治理现代化的内在逻辑研究”(16BKS087)
【分类号】:K092

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郭小凌;古代世界的奴隶制和近现代人的诠释[J];世界历史;1999年06期

2 日知;;中W 古代史分期UO楲的曑搖何在?[J];历史研究;1957年08期

3 徐松岩;古典时代雅典奴隶人数考析──兼评“持续增长说”[J];世界历史;1994年03期

4 沈长云;;关于奴隶制几个基本理论问题的商讨[J];历史研究;1989年01期

5 莫金山;奴隶制问题散论[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1988年03期

6 纵瑞华;对“奴隶社会普遍阶段说”的几点意见——与陈唯声同志商榷[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1987年02期

7 马克W,

本文编号:1804130


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/1804130.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户da5dc***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com