关于中外史学比较研究问题的解说

发布时间：2018-05-07 09:38

本文选题：中外史学比较 + 记史求真　；参考：《山东社会科学》2011年09期

【摘要】：中外史学的比较研究,应当包括中日、中韩(朝)古代史学的比较研究。比较东亚各国同源而异流的传统史学,对于深化史学史研究具有重大意义。这种史学的比较研究,应当解决一些关键性问题,如历史学能够产生的基本条件、史学的基本准则和内在矛盾等。中日、中韩史学的比较,亦需要进行深层次的探讨,研究源于中国的传统史学在其他国度演变出的特色及其原因。中日史学的比较研究,已经预示出可观的学术新境,例如中国传统的历史"正统论",经日本早期政权的改造,形成决定日本统一和天皇"万世一系"社会意识;日本与中国史学近代转型的比较,给历史研究和史学研究以很大的理论启示。中日史学比较研究,有待众多学者参与以共创繁荣。
[Abstract]:The comparative study of Chinese and foreign historiography should include the comparative study of the ancient history of China and Japan, China and Korea (Korea). The comparison of the traditional historiography of the homologous and different flows in East Asia is of great significance for deepening the study of the history of history. This comparative study of history should solve some key problems, such as the basic conditions that can be produced by history, and the basic of history. The comparison between China and Japan, between China and Japan, and the comparison of Chinese and Korean historiography, also need to make a deep study of the characteristics and reasons of the evolution of traditional history in other countries. The comparative study of Chinese and Japanese historiography has already predicted considerable academic conditions, such as the traditional Chinese historical "orthodoxy", through the reform of the early Japanese regime. The formation decided the social consciousness of the unification of Japan and the emperor of the world. The comparison of the modern transformation between Japan and Chinese historiography gave great theoretical inspiration to the historical and historical research. The comparative study of Chinese and Japanese historiography needs many scholars to create and flourish.

【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国、日本及朝、韩史学发展比较研究”(项目批号:08JJD770097)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K091

【共引文献】