当代中国“史学危机”现象研究
发布时间:2018-05-08 06:55
本文选题:当代中国 + 社会转型 ; 参考:《辽宁大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:解放后新中国的史学取得了巨大的进步。但是随着改革开放当代社会全方位转型,20世纪80年代初期以来史学这门学科的发展遇到了巨大的危机。这种现状引起了史学界有识之士的深深忧虑,并展开了史学危机的大讨论,提出了一些应对危机的办法。尽管21世纪史学有了新发展,但史学存在的某些问题至今依然没有得到解决。随着社会的发展和思想的积淀,人们将会提出更加理性的分析,同时也会给出解决“史学危机”的更好办法。因此重新回顾这个课题还是依然很有意义的。 本文的第一部分通过对20世纪80-90年代“史学危机”现象的描述引出当代“史学危机”的概念,并介绍了史学界对该现象的讨论内容。第二部分通过危机现象及其表现形式和类型的分析认识得出危机的本质,并对当代“史学危机”产生的背景及根源进行了研究。第三部分介绍了史学界对当代“史学危机”的反思及应对措施。第四部分为笔者对“史学危机”问题的一些认识及思考。文章结论部分是客观评价当代历史学发展的状况及研究成果,总结得失成败与经验教训并展望史学的未来。 由于文革长期的学术封闭,学术界闭门造车现象严重。上世纪八十年代改革开放才开始步入正轨,国门刚刚打开,国内外的学术思想交流时间也不长,中国当时的历史学理论严重缺失,国内的学术思想还不太成熟,有很多观点比较偏激,同时理论著作也很少,对那个时候的研究产生了不利的影响,所得出的结论也难免保证其客观准确性。随着二十多年社会的发展,学术思想逐步成熟,开始步入正轨,史学研究成果以及理论著作如雨后春笋般扩展,特别是当代历史学理论逐步发展,为当代研究史学问题提供了很好的基础条件。 本论文力争采用新的思维研究方式和理论思想,并结合新的材料,力求突破当时常规的研究思路,拓宽视野,不陷入单纯的史学思维之中,以达到创新的目的。研究材料上除搜集当时和历史学发展有关的报纸评论、文章刊物以及研究论文外,还准备扩大视野,参考国内外有关人文科目的理论著作,同时融入包括人文学科在内的其他学科的理论知识,通过研究分析“史学危机”这一现象寻找其社会和思想根源,梳理当代社会转型及其由此引起的史学变迁的发展脉络。为改革开放以来的社会和思想方面的认识提供一个独特清晰的切入点,为史学工作者总结当代史学发展的得失成败提供一个独特的视角。明鉴前史可以为以后的发展建设提供有益的借鉴,为改革开放建设有中国特色的社会主义文化发展添砖加瓦,也为史学的发展做出点贡献,可以说这从现实和理论的角度来说都是具有重大意义的。
[Abstract]:Great progress was made in the historiography of New China after liberation. However, the development of historiography has encountered a great crisis since the beginning of 1980's with the reform and opening up. This situation has aroused deep concern of the people with insight in the field of history, and launched a great discussion on the crisis of historiography, and put forward some measures to deal with the crisis. Despite the new development of historiography in the 21st century, some problems still remain unresolved. With the development of society and the accumulation of ideas, people will put forward more rational analysis, and at the same time will give a better solution to the "crisis of historiography". Therefore, it is still very meaningful to review the subject again. The first part of this paper introduces the concept of "historical crisis" by describing the phenomenon of "historical crisis" in the 80-90 's of the 20th century, and introduces the discussion content of the phenomenon in the field of historiography. In the second part, the essence of the crisis is obtained through the analysis of the crisis phenomenon and its forms and types, and the background and origin of the contemporary "crisis of historiography" are studied. The third part introduces the reflection and countermeasures of the contemporary historiography crisis. The fourth part is the author's understanding and thinking about the problem of "historiography crisis". The conclusion of this paper is to objectively evaluate the development of contemporary history and its research achievements, summarize the successes and failures, experience and lessons, and look forward to the future of historiography. Due to the long-term academic closure of the Cultural Revolution, the phenomenon of closed doors in academia is serious. It was only in the 1980s that the reform and opening up began to take place on the right track. The country had just opened its doors, and the exchange of academic ideas at home and abroad was not long. The history theory of China at that time was seriously missing, and the academic thinking at home was not very mature. There are many extreme views and few theoretical works, which have a negative effect on the research at that time, and the conclusions can guarantee its objective accuracy. With the development of the society for more than 20 years, the academic thought gradually matured and began to get on the right track. The achievements of historical research and theoretical works have sprung up, especially the theory of contemporary history. It provides a good foundation for the contemporary study of historiography. This paper tries to adopt new thinking research mode and theoretical thought and combine with new materials to break through the conventional research ideas at that time widen the vision and not fall into the pure historical thinking in order to achieve the purpose of innovation. In addition to collecting newspaper reviews, articles, publications and research papers related to the development of history at that time, the research materials are also prepared to broaden their horizons and refer to theoretical works on humanities subjects at home and abroad. At the same time, it integrates the theoretical knowledge of other disciplines, including humanities, and finds its social and ideological roots by studying and analyzing the phenomenon of "historiography crisis", and combing the development of contemporary social transformation and the historical changes caused by it. It provides a unique and clear breakthrough point for the understanding of society and ideology since the reform and opening up, and a unique angle of view for historians to sum up the success or failure of the development of contemporary historiography. The pre-Ming history can provide a useful reference for future development and construction, contribute to the development of socialist culture with Chinese characteristics, and contribute to the development of historiography. It can be said from the point of view of reality and theory is of great significance.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:K092
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周文玖,张子侠;最近中国史学史学科的发展趋势及展望[J];安徽史学;2003年06期
2 施宣圆;要为史学鼓与呼[J];安徽史学;1994年01期
3 杨善芝;;历史学科教育应该注重提升学生人文素养[J];边疆经济与文化;2007年06期
4 胡维革;史学改革大思路[J];东北师大学报;1994年03期
5 何新;;古代社会史的重新认识——从近年出版的两部史著看当代中国史学理论的危机[J];读书;1986年11期
6 苏双碧;;重新学习 重新理解[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1987年01期
7 龚书铎;;从“史学危机”想到的[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1987年01期
8 陈高华;;争取史学理论研究的更大发展[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1987年01期
9 王思治;;关于史学认识论问题的几点浅见[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1987年01期
10 耿云志;;关于史学理论与方法问题的一点想法[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1987年01期
,本文编号:1860404
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/1860404.html