20世纪“新史学”流派对史书体裁的综合创造

发布时间：2018-05-10 09:04

本文选题：“新史学派” + 民族风格　；参考：《人文杂志》2012年01期

【摘要】："新史学派"是20世纪前半期中国三大史学流派之一。在中西文化交融的时代背景下,"新史学"派史家梁启超、萧一山、张荫麟、吕思勉等人继承、发扬中国传统史学勇于进行体裁创新的优良传统,充分吸收中西史书体裁之长,不仅提出许多卓有见识的编纂主张,而且进行大胆地史学实践,创造出诸多令人耳目一新的综合体裁,对20世纪中国历史编纂学的发展作出重要贡献。主要表现为三个方面:一、"仍纪传之体而参本末之法";二、寓传统体裁的精华于近代章节体之中;三、纪事本末体与典志体的大胆糅合。这不仅说明近代以来史书体裁的发展趋向多元和综合,而且也证明中国传统史书体裁与近代西方新史体之间存在共通性,其精华符合于近代史学的要求。
[Abstract]:The New historiography School is one of the three major schools of historiography in China in the first half of the 20th century. Against the background of the blending of Chinese and Western cultures, New historiographers Liang Qichao, Xiao Yishan, Zhang Yin-lin, Lu Simian and others inherited, carried forward the fine tradition of Chinese traditional historiography, and fully absorbed the strong points of Chinese and Western historiography styles. Not only put forward many brilliant ideas of compilation, but also carry out bold historical practice, create a lot of refreshing comprehensive genres, and make an important contribution to the development of Chinese historiography in the 20th century. It mainly shows in three aspects: first, the method of referring to the original and the last; the second, the essence of the traditional genre in the modern chapter; the third, the bold combination of the chronicle and the chronicry. This not only shows that the development of historical genre in modern times tends to be pluralistic and comprehensive, but also proves that there is commonality between Chinese traditional historical genre and modern western new historical style, the essence of which meets the requirements of modern historiography.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院史学研究所;
【基金】：2009年度国家社科基金重点项目“中国历史编纂学的演进路径、优良传统和当代价值”阶段性成果,项目编号:09AZS001
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】