在学术与社会之间:清代经史关系的嬗变与转向

发布时间：2018-05-17 21:11

本文选题：清代 + 经史关系　；参考：《学习与探索》2012年08期

【摘要】：清代经史关系的变化错综复杂,经史纠葛既受学术自身演化的影响,又与社会变迁密不可分,其主流表现为阶段性发展的特点。清初学者尊经重史,史学思想受社会变革及汉、宋兼采之学的共同影响,立足当世,批判现实,博求实证,经史之学的共同指向是经世致用。乾嘉时期,汉、宋分化,汉学特起,学风转化。汉学反对空谈义理、重视名物训诂的思想,直接导致了史学领域重考证、轻议论的治史风格的形成。及至晚清,社会危机催生了今文经学,今文经学的"史学性"使变易历史观得以畅行。同时,因学术因缘与社会巨变的影响,使得经学由学术中心而边缘化并最后消亡,史学则由边缘走向学术中心,完成了经史互动的最后转换。
[Abstract]:The relationship between the classics and the history of the Qing Dynasty is complicated and complicated. The history entanglement is not only influenced by the evolution of the academic itself, but also closely related to the social changes, the mainstream of which is characterized by the stage development. The beginners of the Qing Dynasty respected the classics and emphasized the history. The historiography thought was influenced by the social change and the learning of the Han Dynasty and the Song Dynasty. It was based on the world, criticized the reality, and sought truth from the facts. The common direction of the study of history was to apply the world to the world. Qianjia period, Han, Song differentiation, Sinology special, style of study transformation. Sinology's opposition to empty arguments and the thought of valuing the exegesis of famous things directly led to the formation of a historical style which emphasized textual research rather than discussion in the field of historiography. In the late Qing Dynasty, the social crisis gave birth to the study of the Confucian classics. At the same time, because of the influence of the academic reason and the great social change, the Confucian classics is marginalized from the academic center and finally dies, while the historiography moves from the edge to the academic center, which completes the final transformation of the interaction between the classics and the history.
【作者单位】：河南师范大学社会发展学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“经史流变探源”(11JJD770014)
【分类号】：K092

【共引文献】