先秦“舆人”考论——中国“舆论”概念的历史语源学考察

发布时间：2018-08-11 20:14

【摘要】：20世纪历史学的进步,很大程度上体现在历史学向其他人文社会科学的借鉴并与之融合方面。法国年鉴学派标新立异的新史学正体现了历史学与人文社会科学的融合,特别是历史学与人类学的结合,构成了年鉴学派显著的学术特色。当下历史人类学及与其密切相关的微观史学正流行于世界各国学术界,体现着学术研究的新潮流。人类学强调田野,而历史学强调文献。但在关涉历时态的古史研究中,单凭历史学或人类学显然都是不够的。历史文献所呈现的大多是当时的一个状态或片段,而其演进则需要走进历史田野的考察。本期刊发的这组文章,即为走进历史田野、采用人类学的方法和田野资料研究古史的专题讨论,期望这组专题讨论不论对古史研究的深入,还是对史学研究方法论的建设,特别是多重证据法的丰富,都能有所助益。
[Abstract]:The progress of historiography in the 20th century, to a great extent, is reflected in the reference and integration of history to other humanities and social sciences. The novel new historiography of the French Yearbook school embodies the combination of history and humanities and social sciences, especially the combination of history and anthropology, which constitutes the remarkable academic characteristics of the yearbook school. Nowadays, historical anthropology and microcosmic historiography, which are closely related to them, are popular in the academic circles all over the world, reflecting the new trend of academic research. Anthropology emphasizes the field, while history emphasizes the literature. But in the study of ancient history concerning historical tenses, history or anthropology alone is obviously not enough. Most of the historical documents present a state or fragment at that time, and its evolution needs to be investigated in the historical field. The series of articles published in this issue are to enter the historical field and use anthropological methods and field materials to study ancient history. It is expected that this group of thematic discussions will not only deepen the study of ancient history, but also build the methodology of historical research. In particular, the abundance of multiple evidence laws can be helpful.
【作者单位】：中山大学社会学与人类学学院;
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】