伏尔泰理性主义史学新解
发布时间：2018-08-19 14:01
【摘要】：伏尔泰致力于新型的历史写作,倡导在历史写作中将传统的历史叙述与理性分析结合起来,力图重建人们对历史知识的认识。他以批判的视角研究历史,不轻信盲从权威历史学家的论述,主张历史研究应秉持客观的态度。伏尔泰是理性史学奠基者,拓展了世界史和文化史的疆域。他的著作从整体上暗示了进步的现实,但其进步史观并非机械似的直线论。伏尔泰主张设身处地以当时人的视角看待历史,拒绝笛卡尔的机械唯理论,他的史学观念承接着古典史学,沟通了近代史学。
[Abstract]:Voltaire is committed to new historical writing, advocates the combination of traditional historical narration and rational analysis in historical writing, and tries to rebuild people's understanding of historical knowledge. He studied history from a critical perspective, not believing in the exposition of authoritative historians, and advocated that historical research should be objective. Voltaire, the founder of rational historiography, expanded the territory of world history and cultural history. His works allude to the reality of progress as a whole, but his historical view of progress is not mechanical straight line theory. Voltaire advocates putting himself in the view of history from the perspective of people at that time, rejecting Descartes' theory of mechanical rationalism. His concept of historiography inherits classical historiography and communicates modern history.
【作者单位】： 湖南师范大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K091
本文编号：2191869
[Abstract]:Voltaire is committed to new historical writing, advocates the combination of traditional historical narration and rational analysis in historical writing, and tries to rebuild people's understanding of historical knowledge. He studied history from a critical perspective, not believing in the exposition of authoritative historians, and advocated that historical research should be objective. Voltaire, the founder of rational historiography, expanded the territory of world history and cultural history. His works allude to the reality of progress as a whole, but his historical view of progress is not mechanical straight line theory. Voltaire advocates putting himself in the view of history from the perspective of people at that time, rejecting Descartes' theory of mechanical rationalism. His concept of historiography inherits classical historiography and communicates modern history.
【作者单位】： 湖南师范大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K091
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 魏凤莲;略论伏尔泰的历史观——以伏尔泰对博絮埃的基督教神学史观的批判为讨论[J];山东理工大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
2 何跃;中国的伏尔泰史学研究述评[J];云梦学刊;2001年05期
3 张广智;;略论伏尔泰的史学家地位[J];历史研究;1982年05期
4 孙晶;西方历史学家的移情观及其问题[J];学术界;1999年01期
5 赖元晋;十九世纪西方浪漫主义史学的性质和地位[J];武汉大学学报(社会科学版);1986年02期
6 陈孝丽;项晓霞;;爱德华·吉本的“乌托邦”[J];中国商界(下半月);2008年11期
7 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 黄冬敏;理性主义史学浅论[D];复旦大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 刘明;伏尔泰理性主义史学思想管窥[D];东北师范大学;2008年
2 陈孝丽;爱德华·吉本史学探析[D];江西师范大学;2009年
3 杨芳;理性之光[D];湘潭大学;2002年
，本文编号：2191869
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2191869.html
