论德国与法国的历史叙述发展演进
发布时间：2018-08-30 10:38
【摘要】：在整个欧洲,国别史的历史书写方式已经长达近2个世纪,这种书写方式不仅带来了各国间历史研究的丰富及完善,也造成了历史书写中的竞争;尤其是在对民族国家的历史进行书写时,人们会不自然地将该国的人种、宗教、阶层、性别作为特质进行描述。德国和法国就是之中非常典型的代表,由于地理位置和历史传承的渊源,他们对民族意识的理解有着不少异同点,也一直是现代历史学家热衷于研究的对象。文章将对德国和法国的历史叙述的最新发展进行梳理,以窥视到整个世界历史叙述的发展动态与主流方向。
[Abstract]:In the whole of Europe, the historical writing method of national history has been for nearly two centuries. This writing method not only brings about the enrichment and perfection of historical research among countries, but also results in the competition in historical writing. In particular, when writing about the history of a nation-state, people unnaturally describe the ethnic, religious, class, and gender characteristics of the country. Germany and France are typical representatives, because of their geographical location and historical heritage, their understanding of national consciousness has many similarities and differences, and has always been the subject of keen research by modern historians. The article will sort out the latest development of historical narration in Germany and France in order to see the development trend and mainstream direction of historical narration in the whole world.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学人文社科学院历史学系;上海理工大学;
【分类号】：K091
[Abstract]:In the whole of Europe, the historical writing method of national history has been for nearly two centuries. This writing method not only brings about the enrichment and perfection of historical research among countries, but also results in the competition in historical writing. In particular, when writing about the history of a nation-state, people unnaturally describe the ethnic, religious, class, and gender characteristics of the country. Germany and France are typical representatives, because of their geographical location and historical heritage, their understanding of national consciousness has many similarities and differences, and has always been the subject of keen research by modern historians. The article will sort out the latest development of historical narration in Germany and France in order to see the development trend and mainstream direction of historical narration in the whole world.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学人文社科学院历史学系;上海理工大学;
【分类号】：K091
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈新;论历史性与历史叙述者[J];东南学术;1999年05期
2 陈新;论历史叙述研究中的历史事实概念[J];广东社会科学;1999年03期
3 胡小敏;;历史叙述中的若干语词——读《缺席的权利》有感[J];山东文学;2010年S1期
4 钱理群;四十年前的“历史叙述”——关于“我的大学时代”[J];读书;2000年11期
5 易兰;历史叙述的客观与主观[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
6 王筱芸;颠覆与建构:另一种历史叙述的意义——评《古诗文名物新证》[J];文学评论;2005年03期
7 郭力;生命对家园的寻找——女性学者的历史叙述[J];中州学刊;2005年04期
8 纪众;;历史叙述的文学文本——张笑天的小说特性和方法[J];文艺争鸣;2005年06期
9 李彪;;为历史叙述中的主观性而辩——以《大国的兴衰》为中心[J];湘潮(下半月)(理论);2009年11期
10 王伟;;历史叙述的限度[J];粤海风;2013年01期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 张颖;;虚构性历史叙述的底本边界问题——从以辛亥革命为题材的文本谈起[A];“辛亥百年与四川小说创作”学术研讨会论文集（《当代文坛》2011年增刊）[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 张W，
本文编号：2212819
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2212819.html
