民国“历史研究法”研究
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional historiography has made little achievements in historical methods, but in the specific environment of the Republic of China, there is a trend of thought of "method fever" in the field of history, and books on "historical research method" have emerged. Some of these works echo the idea of "new historiography" and legends; some are for teaching and educating people and preparing handouts; some are for passing on the fire and teaching experience. The purpose is different, but objectively it promotes the construction and development of the methodology of modern history. From Yao Yongpu in the early period to Liang Qichao, he Bingsong, Fu Sinian and so on, they all devoted themselves to the upsurge of "historical research method", and then formed different historical studies with their own characteristics, which made the historiography schools of the Republic of China numerous. The dissemination and development of the Historical Research Law and the historiography of the Republic of China promote the maturity and self-confidence of the historiography of the Republic of China. On the other hand, the history of the Republic of China, with its distinctive personality, endows the Historical Research Law with distinctive characteristics of the times and vitality of its development. The upsurge of "historical research method" can not be separated from the great environment of the history of the Republic of China, and the "historical research method", which relies on the history of the Republic of China, has also formed the characteristics of the integration of the East and the West, tradition and modern, new and old, as well as the historical study of the Republic of China. Therefore, the history of the Republic of China from the perspective of "Historical Research Law" can better clarify the development of the history of the Republic of China and distinctive characteristics of the times.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K092
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗志田;;史学方法的示范与临摹——《名家治史》序[J];社会科学研究;2016年02期
2 申慧青;;从《历史研究法》看漆侠先生的治学之路——纪念漆侠先生逝世10周年[J];廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
3 桑兵;;中国近现代史的贯通与滞碍[J];近代史研究;2010年02期
4 王学典;;新史学和新汉学:中国现代史学的两种形态及其起伏[J];史学月刊;2008年06期
5 胡逢祥;;“科学方法”输入后的中国现代史学之走向[J];学术月刊;2008年03期
6 桑兵;;近代中国的新史学及其流变[J];史学月刊;2007年11期
7 张越;;“新史学”思潮的产生及其学术建树[J];史学月刊;2007年09期
8 董根明;;关于姚永朴《史学研究法》的认识[J];史学史研究;2006年01期
9 陈峰;;两极之间的新史学:关于史学研究会的学术史考察[J];近代史研究;2006年01期
10 邓嗣禹,李扬眉 ,周国栋;近50年的中国历史编纂学[J];山东社会科学;2004年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 郭艳飞;胡适与傅斯年史料观的比较研究[D];安徽大学;2014年
2 周莎莎;论傅斯年对中国现代史学的影响[D];辽宁大学;2014年
3 杨可;梁启超钱穆中西文化融合观之比较[D];内蒙古大学;2013年
4 张宇龙;傅斯年、钱穆、郭沫若之史学方法比较研究[D];宁夏大学;2013年
5 姜爱智;现代新史学理论建设研究[D];华东师范大学;2004年
,本文编号:2287423
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2287423.html