日本实证主义史学的困境与出路——民间历史研究者的挑战与史家责任的重新审视
发布时间：2018-11-19 07:46
【摘要】：日本的学院派史学自形成之日起至今,一直坚持着实证主义研究方法,这一研究方法在今日呈现出诸多弊端,使得学院派史家无法承担起"普世"与"经世致用"的职责。为了弥补这一缺陷,"民间史家"应运而生。他们在研究与著作风格上与学院派史家存在明显差异,代替学院派史家承担起历史学者应尽的职责,逐渐控制了历史知识领域的话语权,对日本民众历史认识与历史观具有极大影响力。学院派史家与民间史家均有各自的优势与缺陷,互相取长补短,在竞争中互相促进是日本史学发展的最佳途径。改进的核心目标应当是勇于承担历史学家"求真普世""学以致用"的职责。
[Abstract]:Since its formation, Japanese academic historiography has been adhering to positivist research method, which presents many disadvantages today, which makes academic historians unable to undertake the duties of "universal world" and "practical application". In order to make up for this defect, "folk historian" came into being. They are obviously different from academic historians in their research and writing style. Instead of academic historians, they take on the duties of historians and gradually control the right to speak in the field of historical knowledge. It has great influence on the Japanese people's historical understanding and historical view. Academic historians and folk historians both have their own advantages and disadvantages, learn from each other and promote each other in the competition is the best way for the development of Japanese historiography. The core goal of improvement should be to take on the responsibility of historians to "seek truth and make use of learning".
【作者单位】： 南开大学日本研究院;
【分类号】：K093.13
本文编号：2341597
[Abstract]:Since its formation, Japanese academic historiography has been adhering to positivist research method, which presents many disadvantages today, which makes academic historians unable to undertake the duties of "universal world" and "practical application". In order to make up for this defect, "folk historian" came into being. They are obviously different from academic historians in their research and writing style. Instead of academic historians, they take on the duties of historians and gradually control the right to speak in the field of historical knowledge. It has great influence on the Japanese people's historical understanding and historical view. Academic historians and folk historians both have their own advantages and disadvantages, learn from each other and promote each other in the competition is the best way for the development of Japanese historiography. The core goal of improvement should be to take on the responsibility of historians to "seek truth and make use of learning".
【作者单位】： 南开大学日本研究院;
【分类号】：K093.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 文青;档案、历史源流辨[J];湘潭大学学报(社会科学版);1990年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 王晓秋 北京大学历史学系教授;历史岂能任意颠覆[N];人民日报;2014年
2 宋京整理;最新美国历史研究动向[N];社会科学报;2002年
，本文编号：2341597
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2341597.html
