在“交流”与“对话”之间重建“家学”——以章学诚研究的接受史为例
发布时间：2018-11-25 10:46
【摘要】：自梁启超运用西方进化论改造"传统史学",倡导"新史学"以来,西方的现代性视域就成为了我们不证自明的参照系,中西史学由此走上同质化的旅途。在20世纪中西史学之间的互动和交错中,本文尝试以章学诚研究的接受史作为线索,辨析以马克思主义史学、考证主义史学、民族文化主义史学为主流的史学形态对章学诚接受的异同,并在此基础上探讨国际汉学界对章学诚的若干研究趋向,最终旨在日新又新的全球化语态中重建中国式的"家学",更进一步反思"传统史学"对于未来世界史学的可能启示。
[Abstract]:Since Liang Qichao used western evolutionary theory to reform "traditional historiography" and advocated "New historiography", the western modern horizon has become our self-evident frame of reference, and Chinese and Western historiography has thus embarked on a homogenized journey. In the interaction and interlacing between Chinese and Western historiography in the 20th century, this paper tries to take the reception history of Zhang Xuecheng's study as the clue, discriminating and analyzing Marxist historiography and textual research historiography. On the basis of the similarities and differences accepted by Zhang Xuecheng in the historical form of ethnocultural historiography as the mainstream, this paper probes into some research trends of Zhang Xuecheng in the international Sinology circle, with the ultimate aim of reconstructing the Chinese style of "family study" in the new and new global voice. Further reflection on the possible enlightenment of traditional historiography to the future world historiography.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092
本文编号：2355822
[Abstract]:Since Liang Qichao used western evolutionary theory to reform "traditional historiography" and advocated "New historiography", the western modern horizon has become our self-evident frame of reference, and Chinese and Western historiography has thus embarked on a homogenized journey. In the interaction and interlacing between Chinese and Western historiography in the 20th century, this paper tries to take the reception history of Zhang Xuecheng's study as the clue, discriminating and analyzing Marxist historiography and textual research historiography. On the basis of the similarities and differences accepted by Zhang Xuecheng in the historical form of ethnocultural historiography as the mainstream, this paper probes into some research trends of Zhang Xuecheng in the international Sinology circle, with the ultimate aim of reconstructing the Chinese style of "family study" in the new and new global voice. Further reflection on the possible enlightenment of traditional historiography to the future world historiography.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王久宇;西方传统史学与史学传统[J];黑龙江农垦师专学报;2002年02期
2 王伟;简论传统史学的历史功用观及其人文主义精神[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2003年02期
3 和震;西方传统史学的批判与反思[J];湖南第一师范学报;2003年02期
4 翁飞;知识经济时代的传统史学研究及其价值[J];学术界;2000年03期
5 曾凡英;传统史学与人生修养[J];唐都学刊;2001年02期
6 曾凡英;论传统史学与人生修养[J];云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年02期
7 都重万;略论晚清学人对传统史学的全面否定与其造因[J];西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年08期
8 刘治立;传统史学与中国古代政治[J];成都行政学院学报(哲学社会科学);2004年03期
9 刘治立;;传统史学的人文精神[J];陇东学院学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
10 林小芳;;妇女史对传统史学的启示[J];广西教育学院学报;2006年02期
，本文编号：2355822
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2355822.html
