“公众史学”的理论基础与学科框架
发布时间：2018-11-26 21:39
【摘要】："公众史学"是指公众在反思自我历史意识和历史认识生成的情形下所进行的历史表现与传播。在新媒体急剧发展、自媒体传播渐成趋势,而公众对历史知识的渴求日益增强的状况下,职业历史学家面临着两种路径的选择:或者是自觉地反思和分析自我历史认识、历史意识的形成过程,扬长补短,成为"公众史学"的参与者或引导者;或者是继续保持"圈内人"并且只面对内行的身份,等待公众这些"圈外人"或外行在新型知识传播方式下自我提升,然后被取而代之。以学术学科的建制与专业性眼光来建设"公众史学"学科乃当务之急。人们可以在历史认识形成过程研究与分析的基础上,超越国外"公众史学"学科建设在理论设计上的零散性;同时,充分考虑自媒体传播的趋势,结合史德、史学方法论、跨学科交流、实务操作四个层次进行学科框架设计。历史知识的公众生产与传播既可以促成社会的有序和健康,也可以导致社会的混乱和病变;在自媒体传播状态下,"历史"的这种双刃剑功能可以在很短的时间内迅速转换。因此,有必要对公众参与历史知识的生产与传播做出战略性思考,尽可能使之形成一个可控而又开放的健康环境。
[Abstract]:"Public historiography" refers to the historical manifestation and dissemination of the public under the condition of reflecting on their own historical consciousness and the formation of historical cognition. With the rapid development of new media and the increasing demand for historical knowledge from the media, professional historians are faced with the choice of two ways: self-reflection and analysis of their own historical knowledge. The forming process of historical consciousness, making use of each other and becoming the participant or guide of "public historiography"; Or keep the "insider" and face only the professional identity, waiting for the public "outsiders" or laymen to improve themselves under the new mode of knowledge dissemination, and then be replaced. It is urgent to construct the subject of public history with the system and professional vision of academic discipline. On the basis of the research and analysis of the forming process of historical cognition, people can surpass the scattered nature of the theoretical design of the discipline construction of "public historiography" in foreign countries. At the same time, considering the trend of self-media communication, combining the four levels of ethics, historiography methodology, interdisciplinary communication and practical operation, the author designs the discipline framework. The public production and dissemination of historical knowledge can not only promote the social order and health, but also lead to social chaos and pathological changes. In the state of self-media communication, the "history" double-edged sword function can be quickly changed in a very short time. Therefore, it is necessary to make strategic thinking on public participation in the production and dissemination of historical knowledge, so as to make it a controllable and open health environment as far as possible.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学历史系;
【分类号】：K092
本文编号：2359693
[Abstract]:"Public historiography" refers to the historical manifestation and dissemination of the public under the condition of reflecting on their own historical consciousness and the formation of historical cognition. With the rapid development of new media and the increasing demand for historical knowledge from the media, professional historians are faced with the choice of two ways: self-reflection and analysis of their own historical knowledge. The forming process of historical consciousness, making use of each other and becoming the participant or guide of "public historiography"; Or keep the "insider" and face only the professional identity, waiting for the public "outsiders" or laymen to improve themselves under the new mode of knowledge dissemination, and then be replaced. It is urgent to construct the subject of public history with the system and professional vision of academic discipline. On the basis of the research and analysis of the forming process of historical cognition, people can surpass the scattered nature of the theoretical design of the discipline construction of "public historiography" in foreign countries. At the same time, considering the trend of self-media communication, combining the four levels of ethics, historiography methodology, interdisciplinary communication and practical operation, the author designs the discipline framework. The public production and dissemination of historical knowledge can not only promote the social order and health, but also lead to social chaos and pathological changes. In the state of self-media communication, the "history" double-edged sword function can be quickly changed in a very short time. Therefore, it is necessary to make strategic thinking on public participation in the production and dissemination of historical knowledge, so as to make it a controllable and open health environment as far as possible.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学历史系;
【分类号】：K092
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 周筱峗,葛剑雄;“古为今用”:历史研究还是历史应用[J];学术界;2004年03期
2 吴漫;20世纪后半叶史学社会功能探讨的得与失[J];中州学刊;2004年04期
3 徐国利;关于新时期史学与现实关系讨论的回顾与总结[J];淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王晓华;近三十年中国大陆史学主潮研究[D];山东大学;2007年
2 王松山;两晋史学发展特征研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李琳娟;1983年—中国新时期史学的转变[D];山东大学;2006年
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 蒋保;影视史学刍议[J];安徽史学;2004年05期
2 王加丰;“理解”:二十世纪西方历史学的追求[J];历史研究;2001年03期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗兰;;发掘真相比说真话更重要——陈明远先生访谈录[J];社会科学论坛;2011年02期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 郎需颖;美国公众史学运动简论[D];复旦大学;2010年
，本文编号：2359693
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2359693.html
