实事求是优良学风及其经受的严峻考验——再谈中国马克思主义史学的思想遗产

发布时间：2019-01-08 15:49

【摘要】：正确地分析和总结新中国史学发展道路,关系到能否自觉地继承、发扬中国马克思主义史学的宝贵思想遗产,而且关系到认清当前史学的发展方向。有的研究者将建国后十七年的史学贬斥为"完全政治化"的史学,认为它毫无学术的独立性,这种看法与历史事实是大相径庭的。从总体看,"十七年"史学虽然经历过严重的曲折,但成绩是主要的。造成评价如此分歧的症结所在,是能否正确把握"十七年"中两种学风的对立及其斗争的实质。"十七年"中存在着两种对立的学风,一种是实事求是、坚持将唯物史观基本原理与中国历史实际相结合的优良学风,一种是教条主义的恶劣学风。"十七年"史学所取得的成就,恰恰是正直、严肃的学者大力发扬优良学风、坚决抵制教条主义恶劣学风而取得的。这是正确评价的关键,也是考察"十七年"史学的一个极其重要的方法论问题。如果离开了这一正确的原则,就会只看到教条化横行,甚至将错误不加分析地归罪于提倡唯物史观,从而怀疑唯物史观科学理论的指导作用。
[Abstract]:Correctly analyzing and summing up the way of the development of new Chinese historiography is related to whether we can consciously inherit and carry forward the precious ideological heritage of Chinese Marxist historiography, and to recognize the developing direction of the present historiography. Some researchers denounce the history of 17 years after the founding of the people's Republic of China as "totally politicized" historiography and regard it as having no academic independence. This view is quite different from the historical facts. On the whole, though the history of seventeen years has experienced serious twists and turns, the achievement is the main one. The crux of the disagreement is whether we can correctly grasp the opposition between the two styles of study in 17 years and the essence of the struggle. " There are two opposing styles of study in Seventeen years, one is seeking truth from facts, the good style of study which combines the basic principles of historical materialism with the reality of Chinese history, and the bad style of study of dogmatism. " In 17 years, the achievements of historiography were achieved by upright and serious scholars who vigorously promoted the fine style of study and resolutely resisted the bad style of dogmatism. This is the key to correct evaluation and an extremely important methodological issue in the study of 17 years of historiography. If we leave this correct principle, we will only see dogmatism, and even blame the mistakes without analysis on the promotion of historical materialism, thus doubt the guiding role of the scientific theory of historical materialism.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】