李维史学研究述评
发布时间：2019-02-12 18:27
【摘要】：自19世纪末以来,李维史学的研究经历了两个阶段。第一阶段从19世纪末至20世纪60-70年代,对李维史学的研究主要是对他所用史料的比对、考证,以及写作体裁的考察。这些基础性的研究成为后来李维史学研究的基石,但同时,李维作为历史学家的地位受到质疑和挑战,其著作的历史价值被质疑。第二阶段从20世纪70—80年代至今。研究的特点是回避对李维史料的研究,着重探讨李维写作的政治、社会象征意义,特别是与奥古斯都时代意识形态之间的关系。学者们在李维的写作具有现实暗示意义方面达成共识,但是,李维是否完全服务于奥古斯都政权则有不同观点。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the 19 th century, the study of Li Wei's historiography has gone through two stages. The first stage is from the end of the 19th century to the 60-70 's of the 20th century. The research on Li Wei's historiography is mainly about the comparison, textual research, and the style of his writing. These basic studies became the cornerstone of the later study of Liwei's historiography, but at the same time, his position as a historian was questioned and challenged, and the historical value of his works was questioned. The second stage from the 20 th century 70-80's to the present. The characteristic of the study is to avoid the study of the historical data of Levi, and to probe into the political and social symbolism of Levi's writing, especially the relationship between his writing and the ideology of Augustus era. Scholars have reached a consensus on the practical implications of Levy's writing, but there are different views on whether Levi fully served the regime of Augustus.
【作者单位】： 中南民族大学民族学与社会学学院;
【基金】：中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助(项目编号:zsy10010)~~
【分类号】：K091
本文编号：2420673
[Abstract]:Since the end of the 19 th century, the study of Li Wei's historiography has gone through two stages. The first stage is from the end of the 19th century to the 60-70 's of the 20th century. The research on Li Wei's historiography is mainly about the comparison, textual research, and the style of his writing. These basic studies became the cornerstone of the later study of Liwei's historiography, but at the same time, his position as a historian was questioned and challenged, and the historical value of his works was questioned. The second stage from the 20 th century 70-80's to the present. The characteristic of the study is to avoid the study of the historical data of Levi, and to probe into the political and social symbolism of Levi's writing, especially the relationship between his writing and the ideology of Augustus era. Scholars have reached a consensus on the practical implications of Levy's writing, but there are different views on whether Levi fully served the regime of Augustus.
【作者单位】： 中南民族大学民族学与社会学学院;
【基金】：中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助(项目编号:zsy10010)~~
【分类号】：K091
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蔡丽娟;;论李维的“范例”史学[J];历史教学(高校版);2007年12期
2 易宁;陈金海;;李维的史学思想与罗马史学传统[J];史学史研究;2009年04期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 蔡丽娟;李维史学探微[D];复旦大学;2005年
2 王悦;李维史学研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年
3 陈姝君;李维与班固史学思想的比较研究[D];山东大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王永杰;弗罗鲁斯史学述略[D];东北师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2420673
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2420673.html
