改革开放初期学术界对郭沫若古史分期理论的论辩

发布时间：2019-03-06 13:53

【摘要】：改革开放初期,在传统古史分期理论框架下,"西周封建论"、"秦统一封建说"、"魏晋封建论"等学派对郭沫若"战国封建论"陆续提出新的质疑、商榷与批判,"战国封建论"学者则在对来自以上各派种种辩难予以回击反驳的同时,也对郭沫若"战国封建论"进行了补充、订正。以上论辩对新时期中国古代社会形态与古史分期的研究起到了一定的拓展与深化作用。改革开放初期的"无奴说"并未彻底推翻包括郭沫若"战国封建论"在内的传统古史分期理论,但其或多或少地影响到改革开放以后中国古代社会形态与古史分期理论讨论的学术走向。改革开放初期学术界对郭沫若"战国封建论"的辩难,也屡屡暴露出理论上的公式主义和史料运用上的实用主义等突出问题,辩论双方多有偏激武断之处,这在一定程度上影响到学术评判的客观与公正。
[Abstract]:In the early stage of reform and opening-up, in the framework of traditional theory of ancient history staging, the schools of feudalism in the Western Zhou Dynasty, Qin unified feudalism and Wei-Jin feudalism put forward new doubts, discussed and criticized Guo Moruo's feudal theory in warring States period one after another. The scholars of warring States feudalism have not only rebutted all kinds of arguments from the above-mentioned schools, but also supplemented and revised Guo Moruo's feudal theory of warring States. The above arguments have played an expanding and deepening role in the study of the social form and stages of ancient Chinese history in the new period. The theory of non-slavery in the early days of reform and opening-up did not completely overturn the traditional theory of division of ancient history, including Guo Moruo's theory of feudalism in the warring States period. However, it has more or less influence on the academic trend of the discussion of ancient Chinese social form and ancient history staging theory after the reform and opening up to the outside world. In the early stage of reform and opening-up, the academic debate on Guo Moruo's "feudalism of the warring States period" also repeatedly exposed prominent problems such as formalism in theory and pragmatism in the application of historical materials, and there were many extreme arbitrariness between the two sides of the debate. To a certain extent, this affects the objectivity and fairness of academic judgment.
【作者单位】：苏州大学社会学院;
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】