比较史学在杜维运清代史学史研究中的应用探析
发布时间：2019-05-18 17:25
【摘要】：杜维运所运用的比较史学是指将各国史学放在一起比较的研究方法。杜维运是积极推进比较史学方法的史家,他在理论探索的同时,也在中国史学史研究中实践比较史学。清代史学史是其比较史学应用得最典型的领域。杜维运清代史学史研究中运用比较史学的原因在于,他既对比较史学的价值有充分的认识,也对清代中前期史学和西方19世纪史学有精深的研究,认为两者具有可比性,对两者进行比较后取得了丰硕的成果,且呈现出鲜明的特点,即倾向于异中求同和史学方法的比较。他在其清代史学史研究领域对比较史学的实践,有助于人们认识中国史学的真实面貌,也有助于清代史学遗产的继承和创新。
[Abstract]:The comparative historiography used by du Weiyun refers to the comparative research method of historiography in various countries. Du Weiyun is a historian who actively promotes the method of comparative historiography. While exploring theory, he also practices comparative historiography in the study of Chinese historiography history. The history of historiography in Qing Dynasty is the most typical field of its comparative historiography. The reason why du Weiyun used comparative historiography in the study of historiography in Qing Dynasty is that he not only has a full understanding of the value of comparative historiography, but also has a profound study of historiography in the middle and early Qing Dynasty and the 19th century in the West, and holds that the two are comparable. After comparing the two, we have achieved fruitful results, and show distinct characteristics, that is, tend to seek common ground in differences and compare historical methods. His practice of comparative historiography in the field of historiography in Qing Dynasty is helpful for people to understand the true face of Chinese historiography, as well as to inherit and innovate the historical heritage of Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 山东大学;
【分类号】：K092
[Abstract]:The comparative historiography used by du Weiyun refers to the comparative research method of historiography in various countries. Du Weiyun is a historian who actively promotes the method of comparative historiography. While exploring theory, he also practices comparative historiography in the study of Chinese historiography history. The history of historiography in Qing Dynasty is the most typical field of its comparative historiography. The reason why du Weiyun used comparative historiography in the study of historiography in Qing Dynasty is that he not only has a full understanding of the value of comparative historiography, but also has a profound study of historiography in the middle and early Qing Dynasty and the 19th century in the West, and holds that the two are comparable. After comparing the two, we have achieved fruitful results, and show distinct characteristics, that is, tend to seek common ground in differences and compare historical methods. His practice of comparative historiography in the field of historiography in Qing Dynasty is helpful for people to understand the true face of Chinese historiography, as well as to inherit and innovate the historical heritage of Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 山东大学;
【分类号】：K092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 庞卓恒;察同察异求规律:比较史学的追求[J];史学月刊;2005年01期
2 王春霞;简论比较史学的原理[J];华夏文化;2005年01期
3 顾銮斋;;比较史学视野中的“赋税基本理论”[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
4 孟庆顺;比较史学方法评析[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1986年01期
5 孟广林;;中国比较史学讨论会述要[J];历史研究;1991年05期
6 史陵之;;近年来我国的比较史学研究[J];历史教学;1991年11期
7 熊家利;建立有中国特色的比较史学[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;1992年06期
8 侯建新;;当代比较史学逻辑发展述论[J];学习与探索;1992年01期
9 赵之恒，，侯树栋;试论比较史学方法的价值及运用原则[J];内蒙古师大学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年01期
10 刘军;比较史学杂谈[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 王]
本文编号：2480193
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2480193.html
