从后现代主义到浪漫主义——一种史学观念的回归
发布时间：2019-06-19 22:21
【摘要】：浪漫主义史学与后现代主义史学都是对现代性作出的回应。基于对空间的关注,它们都反对现代主义的线性历史观,强调史学研究的多重视角。在历史观念和历史书写上,它们呈现出诸多相似性:如对特殊主义、地域主义、偶然性、奇闻轶事、多元性、开放性、差异性的强调;在怀乡情绪中表现历史写作的诗性和审美维度;对微观史和日常生活史的书写等。这表明后现代主义史学在某种程度上是对浪漫主义史学更高层次的回归。
[Abstract]:Romantic historiography and postmodernism historiography are both responses to modernization. Based on the attention to space, they all oppose the modernist view of linear history and emphasize the multiple perspectives of historiography. In terms of historical concepts and historical writing, they show many similarities: such as the emphasis on specialism, regionalism, contingency, anecdotes, pluralism, openness and difference; the poetic and aesthetic dimensions of historical writing in nostalgia; and the writing of microcosmic history and daily life history. This shows that postmodernism historiography is to some extent a higher level of return to romantic historiography.
【作者单位】： 北京联合大学人文社科部;
【分类号】：K091
[Abstract]:Romantic historiography and postmodernism historiography are both responses to modernization. Based on the attention to space, they all oppose the modernist view of linear history and emphasize the multiple perspectives of historiography. In terms of historical concepts and historical writing, they show many similarities: such as the emphasis on specialism, regionalism, contingency, anecdotes, pluralism, openness and difference; the poetic and aesthetic dimensions of historical writing in nostalgia; and the writing of microcosmic history and daily life history. This shows that postmodernism historiography is to some extent a higher level of return to romantic historiography.
【作者单位】： 北京联合大学人文社科部;
【分类号】：K091
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 M.福柯;王U喎，
本文编号：2502679
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2502679.html
