对越南“黄沙、长沙”主权要求及历史依据的评析

发布时间：2018-03-04 20:19

本文选题：越南　切入点：黄沙　出处：《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近年来,中越围绕南海维权的争议和摩擦不断加剧,越南通过举办各类国际研讨会不断将南海问题国际化,同时大量搜集国内外资料(包括越南、中国和西方国家的历史文献、档案、舆图),试图证明对"黄沙"和"长沙"(即我国西沙和南沙)群岛拥有主权,并作为其主权要求的主要历史依据。越南学术界对"黄沙、长沙"主权的论证,所引用的史料和依据存在含糊不清、移花接木、拼凑证据的情况,其观点存在很多漏洞,根本经不起推敲和论证,也无法支撑其对西沙群岛和南沙群岛的主权要求。大量史料充分证明,中国人民最早发现、最早命名、最早开发和经营南海诸岛,并和平地、连续不断地行使管辖权;中国对南海诸岛及其附近海域拥有不可侵犯的主权、主权权利和管辖权,这是毋庸置疑的历史事实。
[Abstract]:In recent years, China and Vietnam around the South China Sea rights disputes and friction intensified, Vietnam will continue to organize an international seminar of the internationalization of the South China Sea, and collected a lot of information at home and abroad (including Vietnam, China and Western historical documents, archives, maps), trying to prove to the "sand" and "Changsha" (i.e., China Xisha and Nansha) has sovereignty over the islands, and as the main historical basis for its claims. The Vietnamese academic circles of "sand, Changsha" sovereignty argument, sources and basis for the existence of vague, deceitful, piecing together the evidence, its point of view, there are many loopholes, not withstand scrutiny and verification, can not support the sovereignty of Paracel Islands and the Spratly Islands. A large number of historical data shows that Chinese people first discovered, the first name, the first development and operation of the South China Sea Islands, and peaceful, continuous exercise of jurisdiction It is an unquestionable historical fact that China has inviolable sovereignty, sovereignty and jurisdiction over the islands in the South China Sea and its adjacent waters.

【作者单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院;广西外国语学院;
【分类号】：D823

【相似文献】