话语制衡与霸权护持
发布时间:2018-03-23 15:23
本文选题:霸权护持 切入点:权力制衡 出处:《世界经济与政治》2017年03期
【摘要】:现实主义理论认为权力的过度集中会引发其他行为体的权力制衡,鉴于国际体系中经常出现"制衡失灵"的现象,霸权何以维持成为需要解释的问题。现有文献大多从其他国家的角度思考为何出现"制衡不足",但是,作为有实力和意愿控制国际秩序的国家,霸权国不会消极等待其他国家的权力制衡,而会积极运用权力制衡维持霸权地位。作者提出话语制衡是霸权护持的重要手段,即通过使用话语策略在国内外建立话语共识和政策联盟,以维持国际霸权结构。具体表现为三种形式:一是旨在建立国内政策联盟的内部话语制衡,二是旨在建立国际霸权联盟的外部话语制衡,三是旨在阻止潜在挑战的消极话语制衡。强大的话语资本和对霸权地位的追求让霸权国拥有话语制衡的先发优势。话语制衡也存在局限,容易加剧霸权国的不安全感和国际体系的不稳定。作者旨在探究霸权国如何通过话语层面的权力制衡进行霸权护持,并以美国亚太再平衡战略为例,增进对美国霸权话语策略的理解。
[Abstract]:The theory of realism holds that excessive concentration of power will lead to the balance of power of other actors. In view of the phenomenon of "check and balance failure" in the international system, Why hegemony remains an issue to be explained. Most of the existing literature considers from the perspective of other countries why there is "insufficient checks and balances", but as a country with the power and will to control the international order, The hegemonic state will not wait passively for the power balance of other countries, but will actively use the power balance to maintain the hegemonic position. That is, to maintain the international hegemonic structure by building discourse consensus and policy alliance at home and abroad through the use of discourse strategy, which is manifested in three forms: first, the internal discourse balance aimed at establishing domestic policy alliances. Second, external discourse checks and balances aimed at establishing an international hegemonic alliance, Thirdly, negative discourse checks and balances aimed at preventing potential challenges. Strong discourse capital and the pursuit of hegemonic status make hegemonic countries have the preemptive advantages of discourse checks and balances, and there are also limitations in discourse checks and balances. It is easy to aggravate the insecurity of hegemonic powers and the instability of the international system. The author aims to explore how hegemonic powers defend their hegemony through power checks and balances at the discourse level, and take the rebalancing strategy of the United States in Asia and the Pacific as an example. To improve the understanding of American hegemonic discourse strategy.
【作者单位】: 外交学院;
【基金】:“外交学院2015年度学生科研创新基金项目”成果 “中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目”(项目编号:ZY2015YA22)成果
【分类号】:D815
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶自成;王日华;;中国和平发展与国际环境的理论总结:崛起国与霸权国关系的新模式[J];国际观察;2008年01期
2 王波;;霸权国内部民主与对外霸权的互动[J];江南社会学院学报;2006年02期
3 朱云汉;刘康;黄e,
本文编号:1654038
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/1654038.html