从2010年钓鱼岛撞船事件看日本外交危机管理

发布时间：2018-04-23 02:12

本文选题：日本危机管理 + 2010年钓鱼岛撞船事件　；参考：《吉林大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前的国际形势变幻莫测，国际危机成为一种常态，不仅对危机当事国产生影响，造成国家利益的损害，而且对地区和国际体系的稳定也构成威胁。和平稳定的周边环境是中国崛起至关重要的外部因素，但就我国目前的外部安全环境而言，依然存在诸多不稳定因素和隐患，朝核危机、有关国家间的领土主权和海洋权益争端、民族分裂主义、恐怖主义等成为地区重大和热点问题。随着我国在国际社会的地位提升和在国际体系中影响作用的增大，面临的地区或国际危机事件呈增长趋势，并越来越多的对我国国家利益形成挑战。2010年可谓是多事之年，从天安号、延坪岛事件到中日撞船的发生，整个东亚地区动乱不安，尤其中日渔船事件对中国的利益形成了重大挑战，使得中日关系骤然降温。从古巴导弹危机、9.11恐怖事件到日本地震引发的核泄漏危机，危机的不确定性及其带来的危害，使各国政府意识到危机管理的重要性，并寻求建立、完善危机管理机制，而危机管理也越发受到学者们的关注。本文选择了2010年钓鱼岛撞船事件作为案例，考察其中的“反常性”并通过与相似事件比较分析，总结日本危机管理的特点、原则等，还阐释了日本危机管理与其对外战略的关系。日本的危机管理有着许多值得重视之处，正所谓“他山之石，可以攻玉”，观察它的特点，把握其规律并对未来动向作出判断和反应，不仅有助于缓解双边矛盾、降低冲突发生的可能性，维护中日和平稳定的大局，也能给我国建立和完善危机管理机制提供重要借鉴。本文运用了理论与实践相结合的方法，通过对个案的分析，从个性中考察共性。对日本危机管理背后的战略进行分析，并试图总结出日本民主党政权的战略变化。本论文除绪论和结论外，共分为四个部分：第一章，首先阐述了危机管理基本理论，侧重厘清相关概念，并依据文章主题，对“危机”、“危机管理”等关键概念作出符合客观实际的定义辨析。还阐述了日本对危机一词的理解，并介绍其危机管理机制及专门机构等情况。第二章为案例分析，首先交代了冷战后中日双边出现危机的一般情况，接着介绍2010年中日钓鱼岛撞船事件引发中日外交危机的过程，用直观阐述方式，按照危机不同的发展阶段对整个事件演变进行了较为详尽的论述。本章作为全文论述展开的重要事实依据，力求在研究和阐述过程中达到全面、客观和系统。但由于可搜集到的相关信息资料有限，难免出现偏颇或数据不全的情况，而且中日两国语境和战略思维具有差异性，即使同样的资料，得出的结果也可能截然不同。第三章，运用理论与实践相结合的方式，从比较分析中总结共性。本章分析了日本危机管理的特点、原则及其效果，论述过程中引用不同的案例为理论提供依据。虽然日本在2010年撞船事件中表现“异常”，但从根本上依旧遵循了一定的原则。最后，提出建立双边危机管理机制的重要性，并简略论述了实施双边危机管理机制的可行性。第四章，，着重分析日本危机管理对对外战略的服务功能，还探讨了同盟因素对对外战略的影响。本章的事实陈述不仅仅局限在领土争端引发的危机部分，而是从国家处理所有重大的涉及到国家核心利益的危机过程的总体上来考察危机管理与对外战略的内在联系。文章认为，虽然危机决策是直接、短期的行为，尤其是日本针对具体事件的外交决策，看似零散而孤立，但其背后却有着一贯而终的战略指导，可谓是日本外交的独特之处。结论部分是对文章总体性的概括和提炼，同时，从日本的危机管理实践中寻找具有启示意义的内容。
[Abstract]:The current international situation is unpredictable. The international crisis has become a normal situation. It not only affects domestic crisis, causes damage to national interests, but also poses a threat to the stability of regional and international systems.
The surrounding environment of peace and stability is an important external factor for China's rise, but there are still many unstable factors and hidden dangers in our current external security environment. The North Korean nuclear crisis, the territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests disputes among the countries, ethnic separatism and terrorism have become the major and hot issues in the region. China has increased its status in the international community and its influence in the international system. The regional or international crisis is increasing, and more and more challenges for the national interests of our country are.2010 years. From the Tianan, the yeonping Island incident to the Sino Japanese collision, the whole East Asian region is unrest and unrest. Among them, the Japanese fishing boat incident posed a major challenge to China's interests and made Sino Japanese relations suddenly cooled.
From the Cuban missile crisis, the 9.11 terrorist incident to the nuclear leakage crisis caused by the Japanese earthquake, the uncertainty of the crisis and the harm brought, the governments are aware of the importance of the crisis management, and seek to establish and improve the crisis management mechanism, and the crisis management has also been paid more and more attention by the scholars. This article chose the Diaoyu Island collision in 2010. As a case, it examines the "abnormality" and analyzes the characteristics and principles of Japanese crisis management by comparing with similar events. It also explains the relationship between Japan's crisis management and its foreign strategy. It will not only help to alleviate bilateral contradictions, reduce the possibility of conflict, and maintain the overall situation of peace and stability between China and Japan, but also provide an important reference for the establishment and improvement of the crisis management mechanism in China.
This paper uses the method of combining theory and practice, through the analysis of the case, inspects the commonness from the personality, analyzes the strategy behind the Japanese crisis management, and tries to sum up the strategic changes of the Democratic Party of Japan. This thesis is divided into four parts except the introduction and the conclusion: Chapter 1, the crisis management base is first expounded. This theory, focusing on the definition of relevant concepts, and based on the theme of the article, makes a definition and analysis of the key concepts such as "crisis", "crisis management" and other key concepts. It also expounds the understanding of the word crisis in Japan, and introduces its crisis management mechanism and specialized agencies.
The second chapter is a case analysis. First, the general situation of the bilateral crisis in China and Japan after the cold war is explained. Then the process of the Sino Japanese diplomatic crisis caused by the Diaoyu Island collision in 2010 is introduced, and the evolution of the whole event is discussed in detail according to the different stages of the crisis. This chapter is a full text theory. The important factual basis of the expansion is to achieve a comprehensive, objective and systematic process in the process of research and exposition. However, due to the limited information and information that can be collected, it is unavoidable that biased or incomplete data are unavoidable, and the context and strategic thinking of China and Japan are different, that is, the results of the same data may be completely different.
The third chapter, using the combination of theory and practice, summarizes the commonness from the comparative analysis. This chapter analyzes the characteristics, principles and effects of Japanese crisis management, and discusses the different cases in the process to provide the basis for theory. Although Japan shows "abnormal" in the 2010 collision incident, it still follows a certain original. Finally, it puts forward the importance of establishing bilateral crisis management mechanism, and briefly discusses the feasibility of implementing bilateral crisis management mechanism.
The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the service function of Japanese crisis management to foreign strategy, and also discusses the influence of the alliance factors on foreign strategy. The statement of the fact of this chapter is not only limited to the part of the crisis caused by the territorial disputes, but the overall investigation of the crisis from the state to deal with all the major crisis involving the National Nuclear interests. The internal relationship between management and foreign strategy is that, although the crisis decision is direct and short-term, especially in Japan's diplomatic policy for specific events, it seems scattered and isolated, but there is a consistent and final strategic guidance behind it, which is the unique feature of Japan's diplomacy.
The conclusion is a summary and refinement of the totality of the article, and at the same time, it seeks some inspiring contents from the practice of crisis management in Japan.

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D831.3;D823

【参考文献】