冷战后日本外交决策过程研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 06:47

本文选题：日本 + 外交决策过程　；参考：《复旦大学》2011年博士论文

【摘要】：鉴于日本外交决策过程对日本外交政策本身产生的重大影响和冷战后在日本外交决策过程中出现的新变化的重要意义,对冷战后日本外交决策过程进行系统、细致的研究是非常必要的。本论文以冷战后至今的日本外交决策过程为主要研究对象,通过冷战后日本外交决策过程的模式化与其案例分析,阐明冷战后日本外交决策过程中出现的变化,趋势及其原因。本文共分为三大部分：绪论、正文(共五章)和结论。在绪论部分,笔者主要是界定研究对象,阐述研究意义,评估研究现状,提出研究思路,交代理论工具和研究方法,以及介绍本文的主要创新点和重难点。第一章是本文的理论探讨。笔者先对研究日本外交决策过程所需要的概念和术语进行定义；然后,对国际关系理论中关于外交决策的论述做出概括,并指出论述的主要成就和不足；接着探讨适合研究冷战后日本外交决策过程的理论框架,提出本课题建立三种模式来进行研究；最后阐述模式的基本形象、相关变量及重要概念。第二章至第四章详细论述了三种决策模式的理论概念及其案例分析。在第二章中笔者详细陈述了“官僚先例决策模式”的理论概念及其历史渊源,并进行其具体的案例分析。本章试图阐明官僚在日本外交决策过程中占中心位置,依照先例进行的决策过程。此章案例分析包括对海湾战争的经济援助、中国与印度的核试验问题。在第三章中,,笔者详细陈述了“政治收拢决策模式”的理论概念及其历史渊源,并进行其具体的案例分析。本章试图阐明多个行为体的不同意见,通过政治过程收拢到平衡点的外交决策过程。此章案例分析包括联合国和平协力法案与PKO法案、发动暂时进口限制措施的决策过程。在第四章中,详细陈述了“首相官邸支配模式”的理论概念及其历史渊源,并进行其具体的案例分析。本章试图阐明首相官邸有效控制决策过程,基本按照首相官邸的意向进行的决策过程。此章案例包括反恐特措法、伊拉克特措法的决策过程。在第五章中,笔者讨论各个模式之间的相互关系。首先探讨了什么时候、什么条件下会出现各个模式,其次讨论了可能出现的混合模式、子类模式,最后阐述了三种模式的历史变迁及其原因。第三部分是结论部分,首先将各种模式的优点和缺点进行讨论,并对冷战后日本外交决策过程的变化趋势阐述一引起笔者的意见,其次提出一些政策启示,最后指出本课题后续研究的方向与意义。
[Abstract]:In view of the great influence of the Japanese diplomatic decision-making process on Japan's foreign policy itself and the significance of the new changes that have taken place in Japan's diplomatic decision-making process after the Cold War, the Japanese diplomatic decision-making process after the Cold War has been systematized. Careful study is very necessary. This paper takes Japan's diplomatic decision-making process after the Cold War as the main research object, through the model of Japan's diplomatic decision-making process after the Cold War and its case analysis, explains the changes, trends and reasons in the process of Japanese diplomatic decision-making after the Cold War. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text (five chapters) and conclusion. In the introduction part, the author mainly defines the research object, expounds the significance of the research, evaluates the present research situation, puts forward the research ideas, explains the theoretical tools and research methods, and introduces the main innovations and difficulties of this paper. The first chapter is the theoretical discussion of this paper. First, the author defines the concepts and terms needed to study the process of Japanese diplomatic decision-making, then generalizes the exposition of diplomatic decision-making in the theory of international relations, and points out the main achievements and shortcomings of the discussion. Then it discusses the theoretical framework suitable for the study of Japanese diplomatic decision-making process after the Cold War, and puts forward three models for the study. Finally, it expounds the basic image, relevant variables and important concepts of the model. Chapter two to chapter four discuss the theoretical concept and case analysis of three decision models. In the second chapter, the author makes a detailed description of the theory and historical origin of the "bureaucratic precedent decision model", and makes a case study of it. This chapter attempts to clarify the central role of bureaucrats in Japan's diplomatic decision-making process. Case studies include economic aid to the Gulf War, nuclear tests by China and India. In the third chapter, the author makes a detailed description of the theoretical concept and historical origin of "the pattern of political cohesion and decision making", and makes a case study of it. This chapter attempts to clarify the different views of multiple actors, through the political process to balance the diplomatic decision-making process. Case studies in this chapter include the UN Peace Cooperation Act and the PKO Act, and the decision-making process to initiate temporary import restrictions. In the fourth chapter, the theoretical concept and historical origin of the "Prime Minister's residence domination pattern" are described in detail, and its specific case study is carried out. This chapter attempts to clarify the effective control of the Prime Minister's residence decision-making process, basically according to the intention of the Prime Minister's residence decision-making process. Examples in this chapter include the anti-terrorist approach and the Iraqi Tesco decision-making process. In the fifth chapter, the author discusses the relationship between different models. This paper first discusses when and under what conditions each pattern will appear, then discusses the possible mixed mode, subclass pattern, and finally expounds the historical changes of the three models and their causes. The third part is the conclusion part. Firstly, the advantages and disadvantages of various models are discussed, and the change trend of Japan's diplomatic decision-making process after the Cold War is expounded, which causes the author's opinion, and then puts forward some policy implications. Finally, the paper points out the direction and significance of the following research.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D831.3

【参考文献】