当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 外交论文 >

沃勒斯坦“世界体系”理论的霸权思想研究

发布时间:2018-05-21 20:40

  本文选题:沃勒斯坦 + 世界体系 ; 参考:《内蒙古师范大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:本文旨在考察沃勒斯坦世界体系理论的霸权思想。沃勒斯坦从资本主义世界经济的角度,详细的探讨了霸权的必然性,深入地剖析了霸权兴衰的经济根源,透彻地揭示了霸权的真实本质和政策目的,独创性地提出了农业、工业生产—商业—金融优势的霸权模式,概括性的分析和总结了霸权国家的共同特点,从而形成了一个较为完整的霸权思想体系。 本论文共分为三部分: 第一部分介绍了沃勒斯坦“世界体系”理论。从产生的背景、主要观点及其影响和缺陷三个方面概述。世界体系理论作为一种理论与方法主要兴起于20世纪70年代的美国,其主要标志是沃勒斯坦于1974年出版的《现代世界体系》,迄今已三十多年。在这期间,这理论不断的深化,并且广泛传播到整个欧洲和其他地区与国家。这理论的主要观点包括:世界体系的种类、世界体系起源与动力、世界体系经济分析、世界体系政治分析、现代世界体系动态发展和过程以及现代世界现状矛盾与毁灭等等。尽管世界体系论的影响日益扩大,但作为一种理论和方法,它也有自己的不完善之处。 第二部分介绍了沃勒斯坦“世界体系”理论的霸权思想。从沃勒斯坦世界体系霸权思想的内容、对历史霸权国的比较和沃勒斯坦霸权思想的体现三个方面进行论述。沃勒斯坦世界体系霸权思想的内容包括:霸权的涵义、霸权的模式、霸权周期和循环、霸权的政策、霸权的衰退和当今世界霸权走势的预测等六个方面;对历史霸权国沃勒斯坦主要从17世纪的荷兰霸权、18、19世纪的英国霸权和20世纪的美国霸权进行比较,从而总结了四个方面的共同点。在此基础上他还阐述了在争夺霸权和维护霸权中国家的作用。 第三部分是文章的主要部分,包括两个方面:一方面是对沃勒斯坦霸权思想的评价。沃勒斯坦的霸权思想虽然是一个完整的思想,但在霸权模式和未来霸权走势上体现了他的不足之处。另一方面是沃勒斯坦霸权思想带来的启示。通过对沃勒斯坦霸权思想的研究,我们可以发现传统的霸权转移相比较,,特定地区国家联合的体系在未来更具有现实性。从而,21世纪的世界将进入无霸权时代。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to investigate the hegemonic thought of Wallerstein's theory of world system. From the angle of capitalist world economy, Wallerstein discussed in detail the inevitability of hegemony, deeply analyzed the economic root of the rise and fall of hegemony, thoroughly revealed the true essence and policy purpose of hegemony, and put forward agriculture creatively. The hegemonic mode of industrial production-commercial-financial advantage analyzes and summarizes the common characteristics of hegemonic countries and forms a relatively complete hegemonic thought system. This thesis is divided into three parts: The first part introduces Wallerstein's theory of world system. From the background, the main point of view and its impact and defects in three aspects. As a kind of theory and method, the theory of world system arose mainly in the United States in the 1970s. Its main symbol is the Modern World system published by Wallerstein in 1974, which has been published for more than thirty years. During this period, the theory continued to deepen and spread widely throughout Europe and other regions and countries. The main viewpoints of this theory include: the kind of world system, the origin and motive force of world system, the economic analysis of world system, the political analysis of world system, the dynamic development and process of modern world system, and the contradiction and destruction of the present situation of modern world, etc. Although the influence of the theory of world system is increasing day by day, as a theory and method, it also has its own imperfections. The second part introduces the hegemonic thought of Wallerstein's "world system" theory. From the content of Wallerstein's hegemonic thought of world system, this paper discusses the comparison of historical hegemonic countries and the embodiment of Wallerstein's hegemonic thought. The contents of Wallerstein's thought of hegemony in the world system include six aspects: the meaning of hegemony, the mode of hegemony, the cycle and cycle of hegemony, the policy of hegemony, the decline of hegemony and the prediction of the trend of world hegemony. This paper compares the historical hegemonic power Wallerstein mainly from the British hegemony in the 17th century to the British hegemony in the 19th century and the American hegemony in the 20th century, and sums up the common ground in four aspects. On this basis, he also elaborated in the struggle for hegemony and the maintenance of hegemony in the role of the state. The third part is the main part of the article, including two aspects: one is the evaluation of Wallerstein's hegemonic thought. Although Wallerstein's hegemonic thought is a complete thought, it reflects his deficiency in hegemony mode and future hegemonic trend. On the other hand, the enlightenment brought by Wallerstein's hegemonic thought. Through the study of Wallerstein's hegemonic thought, we can find that compared with the traditional hegemony transfer, the United system of countries in certain regions is more realistic in the future. Thus, the world in the 21 st century will enter a non-hegemonic era.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D815

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 马万利;试评沃勒斯坦的“世界体系理论”[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年01期

2 杨耕;马克思世界历史理论的当代意义[J];北京社会科学;1994年04期

3 于春江;;“中心”必然导致“霸权”?——对沃勒斯坦世界体系论的一种中国式回应[J];长春市委党校学报;2011年04期

4 张晶;;沃勒斯坦“世界体系”概念的解析[J];长春大学学报;2010年01期

5 施维;;沃勒斯坦世界体系理论综述及思考[J];长江论坛;2007年03期

6 辛向阳;霸权崛起与挑战国家范式分析[J];当代世界与社会主义;2004年04期

7 陈先奎;汤伟;;21世纪:是霸权转移还是霸权终结[J];当代世界与社会主义;2008年05期

8 魏光明;霸权周期理论与中美关系[J];当代亚太;2002年02期

9 杨运忠;“新帝国论”——21世纪美国全球称霸的理论范式[J];当代亚太;2003年01期

10 银锋;;霸权体系、国际冲突与意识形态——美国在国际武装冲突的支持行为中意识形态的作用[J];福建论坛(社科教育版);2009年06期



本文编号:1920738

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/1920738.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2a134***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com