西方干涉决策的规范性转向论析

发布时间：2018-05-30 07:37

本文选题：新干涉主义 + 规范转向　；参考：《世界经济与政治》2015年04期

【摘要】：在近年来新干涉主义日益抬头的背后,是西方干涉决策逻辑正在发生的根本性变化,即从传统的现实可行性向着后现代的道德必要性的转变。西方不仅亲力推广新干涉主义,同时积极利用其既有优势,推动道德必要性借口在全球和地区层次上的扩散,并对具体干涉手法加以调整,以便为新干涉主义争取更大合法性。需要指出的是,西方干涉决策逻辑的规范性也有其客观支持,即全球化背景下的技术发展和个人权利革命及由此而来的国际道德标准提升,而安全概念泛化和国际权势转移也被其当作有力的助推力量。西方利用国际道德标准推动干涉决策逻辑的根本转向,旨在强化其规范性霸权以应对物质层面的国际权势转移。中国需要密切关注西方干涉决策逻辑的这一根本性变化,在外交战略和政策中强调国际社会的底线伦理与道德追求之间的联系与区别,通过集体主义方法倡导建设公正合理的国际道德规范体系。
[Abstract]:Behind the increasing trend of neo-interventionism in recent years is the fundamental change that is taking place in the logic of western interventionism, that is, the transformation from the traditional practical feasibility to the post-modern moral necessity. The West not only popularizes neo-interventionism, but also actively makes use of its existing advantages to promote the spread of moral necessity excuses at the global and regional levels, and to adjust the specific intervention techniques in order to gain greater legitimacy for neo-interventionism. It should be pointed out that the normative nature of western interference in decision-making logic also has its objective support, that is, the technological development and the revolution of individual rights in the context of globalization and the promotion of international moral standards arising therefrom. The generalization of the concept of security and the transfer of international power is also regarded as a powerful force. The west uses international moral standards to promote the fundamental turn of the logic of interference in decision-making, aiming at strengthening its normative hegemony in order to deal with the transfer of international power on the material level. China needs to pay close attention to this fundamental change in the logic of Western interference in decision-making and emphasize in its foreign strategy and policy the connection and distinction between the bottom line of ethics and moral pursuit of the international community. By collectivism, we advocate the establishment of fair and reasonable international moral system.
【作者单位】：复旦大学美国研究中心;
【分类号】：D815;D82

【参考文献】