《德国商法典》:解构抑或重构

发布时间：2018-06-12 21:07

本文选题：《德国商法典》 + 体系重构　；参考：《德国研究》2014年02期

【摘要】：在《德国商法典》的形式规制内容中,第二编"非独资的商事企业和隐名合伙"、第三编"商事账簿"和第五编"海商",不属于严格意义的商法;在实质规制内容方面,代办权、商号法、交互计算、商事代理人、行纪人、承运人、仓库营业人、让与禁止不生效力、善意取得、商事留置权、利息规定和定期商事买卖等,不属于严格意义的商法,应当被归置于民法典;余存的规制内容不存在特殊法典化的必要。在法典体系重构方面,存在两个方案:一是建立企业外部私法;二是区分主体所从事的活动。但无论何种方案,其主旨都是维持既存的商法典。妥适并正确的做法在于,彻底废除商法典,具体就是将其中的主体内容全部归置于民法典之内。
[Abstract]:In the formal regulation of the German Commercial Code, the second edition "Non-sole proprietorship commercial enterprises and dormant partnerships", the third edition "Commercial books" and the fifth edition "Maritime merchants" do not belong to the strict commercial law. Commercial law, trade name law, cross calculation, commercial agent, trustee, carrier, warehouse operator, assignment prohibition, bona fide acquisition, commercial lien, interest provision and term commercial sale, etc., are not strictly commercial laws, It should be placed in the Civil Code; the remaining regulation content does not have the necessity of special codification. In the reconstruction of the legal system, there are two schemes: one is to establish external private law, the other is to distinguish the activities engaged in by the subject. But either way, the main idea is to maintain the existing commercial code. The proper and correct way to abolish the commercial code is to put all the contents of the commercial code in the civil code.
【作者单位】：外经济贸易大学外语学院;
【分类号】：D851.6

【相似文献】