国际关系视野中的诺贝尔和平奖
[Abstract]:Peace is one of the ultimate goals of human beings. The Nobel peace prize is set up to promote the peaceful coexistence of human beings. Since the first issue of the 1901, the Nobel Peace Prize has gone through the history of more than 100 years. In these more than 100 years, human beings have experienced the two worst wars in history, and the world is still unpeaceful so far. Some sensitive areas, conflicts, and violence happen. Human civilization has developed to today, and peace still seems to be unreachable. Even so, people have not lost hope of peace. The history of the more than 100 year of the Nobel peace prize is a proof.
In this paper, the Nobel peace prize is examined in the view of international relations. In the division of time, the author combines the history of international relations with the history of the Nobel Peace Prize together, divides the history of Nobel Peace Prize into six stages, and constitutes the six chapter of this article. The first chapter introduces the concept of "peace", Norbert The historical background of the awarding of the peace prize, the awarding mechanism and the basic liberalism embodied in the Nobel peace prize. The second to fifth chapters divide the history of the 110 year Nobel Peace Prize into four periods, and respectively introduce the development and main characteristics of the Nobel peace prize at each period, and make a contribution to the Nobel Peace Prize winner involved. A brief introduction. The first period was 1901-1918 years. The Nobel Peace Prize before the end of the first World War was mainly focused on the award of organized peace movement leaders and international jurists. The debate on the Nobel Peace Prize in this period was related to humanitarianism, that is, whether humanitarianism helps peace. The Nobel peace Prize Committee The answer was affirmative. The second period was 1919-1943 years. During the two World War, especially in 1920s, it echoed the universal peace expectations of the European Civil and diplomatic circles. The Nobel Peace Prize Committee showed the heat of the construction of the international peace mechanism by the award of the peace prize, but the fragile International peace mechanism did not pass. Under the test of international political reality, part of the Nobel peace prize was not tested. Third periods were 1944-1990 years. Shortly after World War II, with the establishment of the eastern and Western camps headed by the United States and the Soviet Union, the whole world was under the shadow of the cold war, and the award of the Nobel peace prize was no exception. Stalin international peace. The prize (later changed to the Lenin International Peace Prize) was once opposed to the "two poles" in the ideological field with the Nobel peace prize. There was a new trend in the Nobel peace prize, which was the attention to human rights. At the same time, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee's attitude towards nuclear disarmament was gradually supported by the stand of western countries. The fourth period was from 1991 to the present. After the cold war, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee has more broad understanding of "peace". Some "problem areas" such as development and environmental issues have become the focus of the Nobel peace prize. The sixth chapter is mainly the overall evaluation of the Nobel peace prize, It includes the trend of development, the cause of concern and its contribution to the culture of human peace.
The innovation of this paper is the theoretical analysis of the Nobel Peace Prize in the view of international relations. This analysis appears in the last section of the first five chapters in the form of theoretical interpretation. The title is the basic idea of the liberal Nobel peace prize, which is helpful to war or peace, and the Norwegian people's vision. Peace in the global vision, the peace in the world, the peace of justice or order, the theory of international systems, a new view of the Nobel peace prize. Through theoretical analysis, the article concludes that the Nobel Peace Prize embodies the liberal tradition of the West; Nobel and the Peace Prize Committee believe that humanitarianism is also a promotion of peace. One means; the Nobel peace prize, on the basis of the affirmative peace, is pursuing a kind of just peace; the Nobel peace prize can be interpreted from the perspective of the constructivist international system theory - the Nobel peace prize of more than 100 years has become an international system, and this international system is to a certain extent It works.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D80
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任东来;对国际体制和国际制度的理解和翻译[J];国际问题研究;2000年06期
2 时殷弘;旧欧洲的衰颓──论两战之间的英法外交与国际政治[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);1999年06期
3 李铁城,魏能涛;论联合国建立阶段的几个问题——纪念联合国成立四十周年[J];世界历史;1985年12期
4 陈晓律;从发展的角度理解和平学——兼评安德鲁·瑞格比的《暴力之后的正义与和解》[J];南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版);2005年02期
5 高岚君;现代国际人道主义法的定义及其分析[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年01期
6 毛国辉;冷妹;;论科学技术与国际人道法的嬗变[J];西安政治学院学报;2007年04期
7 黎尔平;诺贝尔和平奖及其价值观[J];学术探索;2000年04期
8 刘庆荣;以交易费用为视角考察国际机制的有效性[J];学术探索;2004年07期
9 随新民;国际制度的合法性与有效性——新现实主义、新自由制度主义和建构主义三种范式比较[J];学术探索;2004年06期
10 王虎华;国际人道法的定义[J];政法论坛;2005年02期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 刘博;欧盟对外人权政策研究[D];山东大学;2007年
2 赵永成;人权保护的国际机制研究[D];中共中央党校;2006年
3 夏建平;认同与国际合作[D];华中师范大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李晟光;英国与1924年日内瓦议定书[D];首都师范大学;2007年
2 赵闯;绿色政治理论研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2004年
,本文编号:2124027
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2124027.html