加拿大反恐战略评析
发布时间：2018-09-17 15:41
【摘要】：在恐怖主义威胁日益复杂化和多样化的今天,为保护加拿大海外利益和国内安全利益,维护与美国的联盟关系,加拿大政府于2012、2013和2014年连续出台了一系列有关反恐的官方文件。在2014年议会大厦枪击事件之后,哈珀政府更是进一步调整和改善反恐战略的思路与政策,其反恐态度与手段更趋强硬。但加拿大在反恐问题上追随美国、秉持"双重标准",有些做法脱离实际、过于极端,且对新的恐怖主义袭击方式和公共外交等"软"性手段重视不够,新政策更是引发了国内广泛争议,对其反恐实际效果产生了消极影响。
[Abstract]:In an increasingly complex and diverse terrorist threat, the Canadian government issued a series of official counter-terrorism documents in 2012, 2013 and 2014 to protect Canada's overseas and domestic security interests and maintain its alliance with the United States. After the 2014 shooting at the Parliament House, the Harper administration has further adjusted and improved the thinking and policy of its counter-terrorism strategy, and its anti-terrorist attitude and tactics have become more hawkish. However, Canada has followed the United States on counter-terrorism issues, adhering to "double standards," some of which are unrealistic and extreme, and not paying enough attention to new ways of terrorist attacks and "soft" means such as public diplomacy. The new policy has triggered a wide range of domestic controversy, and has had a negative impact on the actual effect of anti-terrorism.
【作者单位】： 广东外语外贸大学加拿大研究中心;
【分类号】：D815.5
本文编号：2246381
[Abstract]:In an increasingly complex and diverse terrorist threat, the Canadian government issued a series of official counter-terrorism documents in 2012, 2013 and 2014 to protect Canada's overseas and domestic security interests and maintain its alliance with the United States. After the 2014 shooting at the Parliament House, the Harper administration has further adjusted and improved the thinking and policy of its counter-terrorism strategy, and its anti-terrorist attitude and tactics have become more hawkish. However, Canada has followed the United States on counter-terrorism issues, adhering to "double standards," some of which are unrealistic and extreme, and not paying enough attention to new ways of terrorist attacks and "soft" means such as public diplomacy. The new policy has triggered a wide range of domestic controversy, and has had a negative impact on the actual effect of anti-terrorism.
【作者单位】： 广东外语外贸大学加拿大研究中心;
【分类号】：D815.5
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 王伟华;;恐怖主义国际化及其对地区安全的影响[J];理论界;2014年06期
2 程聪慧;郭俊华;;网络恐怖主义的挑战及其防范[J];情报杂志;2015年03期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 芦鹏;曹雪飞;;浅析以色列反恐战略及对中国新疆反恐启示——以“国安委”决策机制为视角[J];中国刑警学院学报;2014年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2246381
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2246381.html
