西欧国家新干涉主义研究
发布时间:2018-10-17 11:37
【摘要】:“新干涉主义”作为西方国家冷战后维护国际社会秩序的重要手段之一,自概念提出至今已有十余年,在此期间新干涉主义不但由一种外交实践拓展成为一种社会思潮,而且不断发展形成了经典的范式。西欧国家作为新干涉主义概念的提出者和行动的重要参与者,其干涉思想与干涉手段都有着自己的特色和体系。西欧国家作为近代民族国家和人权思想的发源地,也对新干涉主义中的两个重要概念“人权”与“主权”,有着深入的思考和丰富的理论探讨。可以说,西欧国家作为当今国际秩序的重要参与者和受益体,作为试图复兴的世界一极,其新干涉主义政策和行为都对当今世界的国际政治格局产生着重要而深远的影响。 通过本文对西欧国家新干涉主义的分析不难看到,西欧国家新干涉主义是西欧国家历史传统与当前局势彼此交融的结果,也是西欧国家的政治制度和国家利益共同作用的结果。因其理论和利益的出发点完全来源于西欧国家自身,所以终究难以成为公平公正世界秩序的一部分,更难以获得世界各国广泛的认可和参与。西欧国家新干涉主义如果无法解决人权与主权、少数与多数、普世价值与文化多样等理论因素之间的内在矛盾,那么将注定成为处处碰壁的失败者。 同时我们也必须认识到,应对全球化的挑战,,国际干涉势在必行,但如何避免让人权问题成为国际干涉的借口,又如何改变国际干涉被霸权主义和利己主义所挟持的局面,都是值得我们深思和探索的。文章最后阐述了我们对待西欧国家新干涉主义的态度和策略,或许对于我们同西欧国家的交往、对于我们反对新干涉主义,探索公平公正的国际干涉有所帮助。
[Abstract]:"Neo-interventionism", as one of the important means of maintaining international social order in western countries after the Cold War, has been around for more than ten years since the concept was put forward. During this period, neo-interventionism has not only expanded from a diplomatic practice to a social trend of thought. And the constant development has formed the classical paradigm. Western European countries, as the initiators of the concept of neo-interventionism and the important participants in action, have their own characteristics and systems of interference. As the birthplace of modern nation-state and human rights thought, Western European countries also have deep thinking and rich theoretical discussion on the two important concepts of "human rights" and "sovereignty" in neo-interventionism. It can be said that as an important participant and beneficiary of the current international order and as a world pole trying to revive, Western European countries' neo-interventionist policies and actions have an important and far-reaching impact on the international political pattern of the present world. Through the analysis of neo-interventionism in Western European countries, it is not difficult to see that neo-interventionism in Western European countries is the result of the blending of historical tradition and current situation of Western European countries, and the joint action of the political system and national interests of Western European countries. Because the starting point of its theory and interests comes from the western European countries, it is difficult to become a part of the fair and just world order, and it is even more difficult to obtain the extensive recognition and participation of the countries in the world. If the neo-interventionism in Western European countries cannot solve the inherent contradiction between human rights and sovereignty, minority and majority, universal value and cultural diversity, then it will be doomed to be a loser. At the same time, we must also recognize that international intervention is imperative to deal with the challenges of globalization, but how to avoid making the issue of human rights an excuse for international intervention and how to change the situation in which international intervention is held hostage by hegemonism and egoism, Are worthy of our deep thinking and exploration. At the end of the article, the author expounds our attitude and strategy towards neo-interventionism in Western European countries, which may be helpful to our contacts with Western European countries, to our opposition to neo-interventionism and to the exploration of fair and just international interference.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D871.2
本文编号:2276534
[Abstract]:"Neo-interventionism", as one of the important means of maintaining international social order in western countries after the Cold War, has been around for more than ten years since the concept was put forward. During this period, neo-interventionism has not only expanded from a diplomatic practice to a social trend of thought. And the constant development has formed the classical paradigm. Western European countries, as the initiators of the concept of neo-interventionism and the important participants in action, have their own characteristics and systems of interference. As the birthplace of modern nation-state and human rights thought, Western European countries also have deep thinking and rich theoretical discussion on the two important concepts of "human rights" and "sovereignty" in neo-interventionism. It can be said that as an important participant and beneficiary of the current international order and as a world pole trying to revive, Western European countries' neo-interventionist policies and actions have an important and far-reaching impact on the international political pattern of the present world. Through the analysis of neo-interventionism in Western European countries, it is not difficult to see that neo-interventionism in Western European countries is the result of the blending of historical tradition and current situation of Western European countries, and the joint action of the political system and national interests of Western European countries. Because the starting point of its theory and interests comes from the western European countries, it is difficult to become a part of the fair and just world order, and it is even more difficult to obtain the extensive recognition and participation of the countries in the world. If the neo-interventionism in Western European countries cannot solve the inherent contradiction between human rights and sovereignty, minority and majority, universal value and cultural diversity, then it will be doomed to be a loser. At the same time, we must also recognize that international intervention is imperative to deal with the challenges of globalization, but how to avoid making the issue of human rights an excuse for international intervention and how to change the situation in which international intervention is held hostage by hegemonism and egoism, Are worthy of our deep thinking and exploration. At the end of the article, the author expounds our attitude and strategy towards neo-interventionism in Western European countries, which may be helpful to our contacts with Western European countries, to our opposition to neo-interventionism and to the exploration of fair and just international interference.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D871.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 陈瑶;“新干涉主义”探析[J];高校理论战线;2003年05期
2 贺鉴;;“人道主义干涉”对国际法基本原则的冲击[J];河北法学;2006年11期
3 蒲俜;国际干预与新干涉主义[J];教学与研究;2000年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 汤燕;布莱尔政府外交政策研究[D];华中师范大学;2008年
2 杨益;试析冷战后欧美人权外交的观念差异[D];华东师范大学;2008年
本文编号:2276534
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2276534.html