朝核危机管理与中美政策探析
发布时间：2018-11-15 23:00
【摘要】：国际核危机管理,是人类对现代历史进程中形成的国际社会之中国家间安全稀缺“救济品”进行管理的一次艰难尝试。最终形成的“大国协调模式”在相当一段历史时期中发挥了关键作用,并将在可预见的未来继续发挥这种重要作用。核问题的发生起源于资本主义国家对社会主义国家的安全不信任,并在20世纪90年代初期开始以几次朝核危机的方式集中爆发出来。时至今日,人们至少经历了3次不断升级的朝核危机的冲击。朝核危机对朝鲜半岛乃至东北亚地区各国的稳定发展环境的破坏和潜在不利影响不言而喻,相关各国以各种方式寻求这一危机的解决方案。借鉴大国协调管理国际核危机的模式,在东北亚地区发展进程中占据主导地位的中美两个大国,逐渐形成对朝核危机的协同管理,其中主要体现在以六方会谈为主的多边管理框架和机制的运作和成果中。中美朝核危机合作管理的结果有得有失,经验值得总结,缺失值得反思。对两国来说更为重要的是,共同经历过朝鲜半岛的起伏波折后,将要以怎样更加安全有效的管理方式和渠道,尽快促进朝核问题的根本解决。
[Abstract]:International nuclear crisis management is a difficult attempt for mankind to manage the scarce "relief goods" among countries in the international community formed in the process of modern history. The "Great Power Coordination Model" has played a key role in a considerable period of history and will continue to play this important role in the foreseeable future. The nuclear issue originated from the distrust of the security of socialist countries in capitalist countries and began to erupt in the early 1990s in the form of several nuclear crises in North Korea. Today, people have experienced at least three escalating shocks from the North Korean nuclear crisis. The damage and potential adverse effects of the Korean nuclear crisis on the stable development environment of the Korean Peninsula and even the countries in Northeast Asia are self-evident, and the countries concerned seek a solution to the crisis in various ways. Drawing lessons from the model of coordinating and managing the international nuclear crisis by major powers, China and the United States, which occupy a dominant position in the development process of Northeast Asia, have gradually formed a coordinated management of the North Korean nuclear crisis. This is mainly reflected in the operation and results of the six-Party talks-based multilateral regulatory framework and mechanism. The results of Sino-American nuclear crisis management are worth summing up and reflection. What is more important for the two countries is that after going through the ups and downs of the Korean Peninsula together, they will promote the fundamental solution of the DPRK nuclear issue as soon as possible through more safe and effective management methods and channels.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D815.2
本文编号：2334657
[Abstract]:International nuclear crisis management is a difficult attempt for mankind to manage the scarce "relief goods" among countries in the international community formed in the process of modern history. The "Great Power Coordination Model" has played a key role in a considerable period of history and will continue to play this important role in the foreseeable future. The nuclear issue originated from the distrust of the security of socialist countries in capitalist countries and began to erupt in the early 1990s in the form of several nuclear crises in North Korea. Today, people have experienced at least three escalating shocks from the North Korean nuclear crisis. The damage and potential adverse effects of the Korean nuclear crisis on the stable development environment of the Korean Peninsula and even the countries in Northeast Asia are self-evident, and the countries concerned seek a solution to the crisis in various ways. Drawing lessons from the model of coordinating and managing the international nuclear crisis by major powers, China and the United States, which occupy a dominant position in the development process of Northeast Asia, have gradually formed a coordinated management of the North Korean nuclear crisis. This is mainly reflected in the operation and results of the six-Party talks-based multilateral regulatory framework and mechanism. The results of Sino-American nuclear crisis management are worth summing up and reflection. What is more important for the two countries is that after going through the ups and downs of the Korean Peninsula together, they will promote the fundamental solution of the DPRK nuclear issue as soon as possible through more safe and effective management methods and channels.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D815.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐漪;朝鲜半岛的格局与未来[J];东北亚论坛;2003年02期
2 甘峰,俞素美;新一轮朝鲜核危机与日、韩、美3国协调体制[J];东北亚论坛;2003年03期
3 张玉国;核问题与美朝关系[J];东北亚论坛;2003年04期
4 仇发华;中国在朝鲜核问题上的作用及其受局限的原因分析[J];东北亚论坛;2005年02期
5 石源华;;朝鲜核试爆与重开六方会谈[J];东北亚论坛;2007年01期
6 蔡建;;六方会谈与东北亚安全合作机制[J];东北亚论坛;2008年06期
7 张琏瑰;;朝鲜核问题现状与美国责任[J];东北亚学刊;2012年02期
8 邱美荣;威胁认知与朝核危机[J];当代亚太;2005年06期
9 姜龙范;;朝核问题与中国的战略选择[J];东疆学刊;2007年03期
10 王斌;朝鲜核危机与日朝关系正常化[J];东南亚研究;2004年01期
，本文编号：2334657
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2334657.html
