奥巴马对小布什“以信仰为基础的倡议”之继承与发展
[Abstract]:In the United States, religious organizations and governments have long established close and extensive cooperation in the provision of social services. Federal, state and local governments have faded away from the dominant role of providing social welfare, increasingly relying on community grass-roots organizations to deal with difficult social problems. Religious organizations can deeply understand and contact the living conditions of the general public, especially the people at the bottom of the community, and they tend to be more comfortable in carrying out social affairs. Integrating the resident forces and strengths of religious organizations for better development of communities is a great deal for the government. Encouraging religious organizations to participate in government-funded social welfare programs has long been bipartisan in the federal government. During his eight-year tenure, George W.Bush launched the "faith-based initiative" across the country, established the White House Office of Faith and Community Initiative, and effectively advanced the initiative at the federal, state and local levels. Faith-to-faith initiatives became a hallmark of President Bush's presidency. His successor, Barack Obama (Barack Obama), made it clear during the campaign that he would continue to support religious and community-based organizations working with the government, and fully retained the "Office of Faith" system created by George W. Bush when he took office. But there is no lack of innovation, in addition to symbolically changing the name of the original White House Office of Faith and delineating the main issues to be addressed, a new 25-member advisory committee has been set up. This paper focuses on the White House Office of Faith, and compares the relevant policies and strategic guidelines issued by Obama by combing Bush's policy efforts and major progress made to promote the "faith-based initiative". The aim is to summarize Obama's inheritance and innovative development of Bush's significant but controversial policy. This paper is divided into the following parts: the first chapter expounds the connotation and classification, characteristics and advantages of faith-based organization from the theoretical framework of religious non-governmental organizations, as well as the interactive relationship between faith-based organization and government cooperation; The second chapter reviews the background, implementation, legislative efforts and main disputes of Bush's "belief-based Initiative". The third chapter summarizes the Obama administration's inheritance and criticism, policy adjustment and innovation of Bush's faith-based initiative. The fourth chapter discusses the basic consensus that both Republican and Democratic presidents support the faith initiative, and Obama and George W. Bush's faith initiative policy comparison. The fifth chapter is a brief conclusion. This paper argues that Obama inherits the pragmatic and flexible attitude of Bush's belief initiative, which is similar to his ideas of advocating multilateralism and weakening the pragmatism of ideology in the international community. The starting point for the United States Government to encourage faith and community-based organizations to participate in public welfare is the realistic need to solve social problems. Taking advantage of the unique advantages and social resources of religious non-governmental organizations, both sides take what they need and form complementary advantages. The ultimate goal is to maximize social welfare. Obama inherited Bush's faith initiative and tactfully continued the campaign's embrace of religion. Mr Obama's advisory committee, which invites a large number of influential religious leaders and secular elites to serve as advisers, is more implicit and subtle than Bush's reliance on religious conservatives, making the initiative more politically motivated.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D871.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 倪峰;小布什政府对华政策展望[J];时事(时事报告大学生版);2000年03期
2 李洪峰;;小布什第一任期对华安全政策探析[J];理论学习;2007年05期
3 牛长振;;评析小布什政府的新保守主义外交政策的局限性[J];大连干部学刊;2007年09期
4 朱锋;小布什政府的朝鲜半岛政策:调整与前瞻[J];国际政治研究;2001年03期
5 薛福康;;小布什政府将如何迈步2001年对华关系[J];党政干部文摘;2001年02期
6 刘恩东;沃尔福威茨其人[J];国际资料信息;2002年06期
7 陈锴;;“后萨达姆时代”与小布什的新伊拉克政策[J];社会观察;2007年04期
8 史卉;;论小布什执政时期美国的环境外交[J];前沿;2007年10期
9 却正强;;小布什政府亚太安全战略特点分析[J];考试周刊;2007年51期
10 李强;;美国小布什政府反恐战略[J];经营管理者;2009年20期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 马健;;当前美欧关系演变规律探究[A];国际关系研究:新领域与新理论——2010年博士论坛[C];2010年
2 罗利建;;用反克为主的错位反攻战略破美国视中国为首要敌人战略[A];2002中国未来与发展研究报告[C];2002年
3 汪亭友;;如何看待金融危机背景下的世界社会主义运动形势[A];“后国际金融危机时代的世界社会主义”学术研讨会暨当代世界社会主义专业委员会2010年年会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 特约撰稿李海东;打下伊拉克后美国只能挑战自己[N];中国经营报;2003年
2 本报驻华盛顿记者 薛福康;小布什政府将如何迈步[N];光明日报;2000年
3 威廉·恩道尔 戴健 李峰 顾秀林 译;“大中东”狼烟四起[N];中国工业报;2011年
4 朱俊生;小布什政府健康保险改革述评[N];中国保险报;2004年
5 罗余才;斗争中的发展[N];亚太经济时报;2001年
6 本报记者 廖勤 安峥 张全;沧桑十年,“9·11”带来哪些改变[N];解放日报;2011年
7 赵穗生 美国丹佛大学国际关系学院教授 中美合作中心执行主任 张小溪 采访整理;美国:称霸之路走不通[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
8 加伦·卡彭特;美国应尊重俄中“势力范围”[N];国防时报;2010年
9 张文木 北京航空航天大学战略问题研究中心研究员;凯南的反思:从遏制到温和[N];中国国防报;2010年
10 林利民 中国现代国际关系研究院研究员、《现代国际关系》主编;“9·11”十年回眸:世界有哪些新变化[N];中国国防报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 邵育群;美国国会与台湾问题(1979-2002)[D];复旦大学;2003年
2 魏晓莎;石油危机后美国能源政策制定的政治经济学研究[D];吉林大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李瑶;奥巴马对小布什“以信仰为基础的倡议”之继承与发展[D];复旦大学;2010年
2 马瑞娟;小布什的中东民主战略探析[D];河北师范大学;2010年
3 童彦;论小布什政府的贸易保护政策[D];暨南大学;2009年
4 王新颖;试论小布什政府中亚能源战略及影响[D];河南大学;2012年
5 张晖;小布什政府的东北亚安全战略探析[D];复旦大学;2010年
6 宋雨星;小布什政府对台政策研究[D];中共中央党校;2011年
7 潘开;小布什政府的中东政策研究[D];辽宁大学;2012年
8 袁川;小布什政府“大中东计划”受挫影响因素研究[D];暨南大学;2012年
9 邢新宇;论小布什政府的对朝政策[D];青岛大学;2010年
10 李海霞;评小布什时期的美古关系[D];山东师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2436229
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2436229.html