争论焦点和集团重组——政府间谈判阶段的安理会改革
发布时间：2019-06-05 03:03
【摘要】：联合国大会第62/557号决定标志着安理会改革由"不限成员名额工作组"模式转变为政府间谈判模式。在政府间谈判阶段,各种改革力量围绕谈判框架和谈判原则展开了激烈交锋。成员国主导原则得到了中国以及"团结谋共识"集团的积极支持。同时,改革中的一些主要集团也发生着分化和重组。在原有的四国集团、"团结谋共识"、非洲联盟等国家集团之外,L69集团、小岛国家联盟等新的集团也日益活跃起来。印度等国家领导的L69集团试图扮演协调各方立场的角色。非洲联盟内部的立场分歧有加剧的趋势,成为影响改革进展的一大变数。美国在这一阶段调整了对印度"入常"的态度,拉拢印度制衡中国的意图更加明显。为此,中国在政府间谈判中宜采取"低介入"的策略,防止安理会改革成为离间中印和中非关系的工具。
[Abstract]:Un General Assembly decision 62 / 557 marks a shift in Security Council reform from an "open-ended working group" model to an intergovernmental negotiating model. In the intergovernmental negotiation stage, various reform forces engaged in fierce confrontation around the negotiation framework and negotiation principles. The principle of membership dominance has been actively supported by China and the Uniting for consensus group. At the same time, some of the major groups in the reform are also divided and reorganized. In addition to the original Group of four, Uniting for consensus, the African Union and other groups of countries, the L69 Group, the Alliance of small Island States and other new groups are becoming increasingly active. The L69 group, led by countries such as India, is trying to play the role of coordinating the positions of all parties. There is a growing trend of divergence of positions within the African Union, which has become a major variable affecting the progress of reform. At this stage, the United States has adjusted its attitude towards India, and its intention to attract India to check and balance China is even more obvious. To this end, China should adopt a "low intervention" strategy in intergovernmental negotiations to prevent the reform of the Security Council from becoming a tool to separate China-India and China-Africa relations.
【作者单位】： 上海对外经贸大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“联合国安理会改革与美国的选择性支持政策研究”(12YJCGJW009)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D813.2
，
本文编号：2493208
[Abstract]:Un General Assembly decision 62 / 557 marks a shift in Security Council reform from an "open-ended working group" model to an intergovernmental negotiating model. In the intergovernmental negotiation stage, various reform forces engaged in fierce confrontation around the negotiation framework and negotiation principles. The principle of membership dominance has been actively supported by China and the Uniting for consensus group. At the same time, some of the major groups in the reform are also divided and reorganized. In addition to the original Group of four, Uniting for consensus, the African Union and other groups of countries, the L69 Group, the Alliance of small Island States and other new groups are becoming increasingly active. The L69 group, led by countries such as India, is trying to play the role of coordinating the positions of all parties. There is a growing trend of divergence of positions within the African Union, which has become a major variable affecting the progress of reform. At this stage, the United States has adjusted its attitude towards India, and its intention to attract India to check and balance China is even more obvious. To this end, China should adopt a "low intervention" strategy in intergovernmental negotiations to prevent the reform of the Security Council from becoming a tool to separate China-India and China-Africa relations.
【作者单位】： 上海对外经贸大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“联合国安理会改革与美国的选择性支持政策研究”(12YJCGJW009)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D813.2
，
本文编号：2493208
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2493208.html
