东北亚安全模式转型——从双边同盟到多边外交
发布时间：2019-06-06 16:59
【摘要】： 现实主义理论认为国际体系是一个自助体系。在这样的体系中,各国通过正式或非正式的契约进行军事合作以增进它们的安全,防范潜在威胁,这样便产生了同盟。安全模式是指行为体(主要指国家或政府组织)长期遵循的安全行为方式。同盟安全模式就是行为体通过创建、维持同盟而实现安全的安全行为方式。除了同盟安全模式外,国际政治领域还有:霸权安全模式、均势安全模式、集体安全模式、多边合作安全模式和多边外交安全模式等安全模式。体系内主导安全模式与非主导安全模式的地位是可以转换的。安全模式转型实际上是新安全模式影响力相对上升,旧安全模式影响力相对下降并直至被取代或同化的过程,是在体系战略安全环境改变前提下,权力转移、安全问题转移共同作用的结果。 东北亚地区当前主要存在双边同盟安全模式和多边外交安全模式这两种安全模式。以美日、美韩同盟为基础的双边同盟安全模式产生于冷战时期,长期以来是东北亚地区的主导安全模式。作为冷战的遗迹,双边同盟安全模式已越来越不能适应冷战后东北亚不断发展变化的战略安全环境,在传统安全及非传统安全领域呈现出种种弊端。在解决朝核问题中诞生的六方会谈机制是东北亚多边外交安全模式的代表。从六方会谈机制产生之日起,东北亚安全模式已经开始了由双边同盟到多边外交转型的进程并呈现出一种必然趋势。 冷战结束以来,在三个核心因素:权力分配变化、经济相互信赖加深、非传统安全问题增多的共同作用下,东北亚地区的战略安全环境发生了深刻变化,为安全模式从双边同盟到多边外交转型创造了前提条件。东北亚安全模式转型的内在机制是:引起地区战略安全环境改变的三个核心因素,共同引起东北亚地区的权力转移和安全问题转移,进而引起安全模式由双边同盟向多边外交转型。从第一次朝核危机开始,东北亚地区已经出现一系列具有多边外交安全模式特点的安全机制,如四方会谈机制、日、韩、美3边协调与监督机制(TCOG)及后来的三方会谈、六方会谈机制。六方会谈机制在第二次朝核危机中发挥了积极的作用,成为各方所认可的、解决朝核问题的正式多边外交机制。 东北亚地区不仅存在朝核问题,还存在众多其他安全问题,诸如边界争端、能源安全、金融安全等问题。这些安全问题既涉及传统安全又涉及非传统安全,单凭六方会谈机制难以解决所有问题。所以,推动东北亚安全模式转型最切实可行的路径是:在完善六方会谈机制的基础上,将其功能从传统安全领域向非传统安全领域扩展,使其成为一个能够解决东北亚所有安全问题的多边外交安全体系。 东北亚安全模式转型是一个长期、渐进、曲折的过程,但却是一种必然趋势。中国要成为这一趋势坚定不移的推动者,通过处理好各种关系,实现中国和平崛起与东北亚安全模式转型的良性互动。
[Abstract]:The realism theory holds that the international system is a self-service system. In such a system, States have generated alliances by conducting military cooperation through formal or informal contracts to enhance their security and to guard against potential threats. The security model refers to the manner in which the behavior body (mainly refers to the state or government organization) has long-term follow-up. The security model of the alliance is the safe behavior way of the behavior body to realize the security by creating and maintaining the alliance. In addition to the alliance security model, there are security models such as the hegemonic security model, the balance-potential security model, the collective security model, the multilateral cooperation security model and the multilateral diplomacy security model. The status of the dominant security mode and the non-dominant security mode in the system is convertible. The transformation of the security model is actually the relative rise of the influence of the new security model, the influence of the old security model is relatively lowered and the process of being replaced or assimilated is the result of the common effect of the transfer of power and the transfer of the safety problem on the premise of the change of the security environment of the system. There are two security modes of the bilateral alliance and the multilateral diplomacy security model in the Northeast Asia. The security model of the bilateral alliance based on the United States of America and the United States and Korea has long been the leading one in the Northeast Asia during the cold war. As the remains of the cold war, the security model of the two-sided alliance has become more and more difficult to adapt to the strategic security environment of the ever-changing development of the Northeast Asia after the cold war, and in the fields of traditional security and non-traditional security The mechanism of the six-party talks, which is born in the nuclear issue, is the multilateral diplomacy security model in North-East Asia. From the date of the six-party talks, the security model in North-East Asia has begun the process of transforming from a bilateral alliance to a multilateral diplomatic transition and presents a way The strategic security environment in the Northeast Asia has three core factors since the end of the cold war: the change of power distribution, the deepening of mutual trust between the economy and the increase of non-traditional security. A profound change in the security model from the bilateral to the multilateral diplomatic transition The internal mechanism of the transformation of the security model in North-East Asia is the three core factors that cause the change of the security environment of the regional strategy, which causes the transfer of the power and the security of the Northeast Asia, and then the security model is caused by the bilateral alliance. A series of security mechanisms, such as the Quartet, Japan, South Korea, the United States, the United States, the Coordination and Oversight Mechanism (TCOG) and the subsequent three-party talks, have emerged from the first nuclear crisis in North-East Asia. The mechanism of the Six-Party Talks has played a positive role in the second nuclear crisis, and has become an accepted solution to the nuclear issue. There are many other security issues, such as border dispute, energy, The issues of source security, financial security, etc. These security issues concern both traditional security and non-traditional security, with a single-party basis On the basis of improving the mechanism of the Six-Party Talks, it extends its function from the traditional security field to the non-traditional security field, making it a problem that can solve all the security of Northeast Asia The transition of the security model in North-East Asia is a long-term, gradual, It is an inevitable trend, but it is an inevitable trend. China will become a driver of this trend, and achieve the rise of China's peace through the process of all kinds of relations
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D831
本文编号：2494457
[Abstract]:The realism theory holds that the international system is a self-service system. In such a system, States have generated alliances by conducting military cooperation through formal or informal contracts to enhance their security and to guard against potential threats. The security model refers to the manner in which the behavior body (mainly refers to the state or government organization) has long-term follow-up. The security model of the alliance is the safe behavior way of the behavior body to realize the security by creating and maintaining the alliance. In addition to the alliance security model, there are security models such as the hegemonic security model, the balance-potential security model, the collective security model, the multilateral cooperation security model and the multilateral diplomacy security model. The status of the dominant security mode and the non-dominant security mode in the system is convertible. The transformation of the security model is actually the relative rise of the influence of the new security model, the influence of the old security model is relatively lowered and the process of being replaced or assimilated is the result of the common effect of the transfer of power and the transfer of the safety problem on the premise of the change of the security environment of the system. There are two security modes of the bilateral alliance and the multilateral diplomacy security model in the Northeast Asia. The security model of the bilateral alliance based on the United States of America and the United States and Korea has long been the leading one in the Northeast Asia during the cold war. As the remains of the cold war, the security model of the two-sided alliance has become more and more difficult to adapt to the strategic security environment of the ever-changing development of the Northeast Asia after the cold war, and in the fields of traditional security and non-traditional security The mechanism of the six-party talks, which is born in the nuclear issue, is the multilateral diplomacy security model in North-East Asia. From the date of the six-party talks, the security model in North-East Asia has begun the process of transforming from a bilateral alliance to a multilateral diplomatic transition and presents a way The strategic security environment in the Northeast Asia has three core factors since the end of the cold war: the change of power distribution, the deepening of mutual trust between the economy and the increase of non-traditional security. A profound change in the security model from the bilateral to the multilateral diplomatic transition The internal mechanism of the transformation of the security model in North-East Asia is the three core factors that cause the change of the security environment of the regional strategy, which causes the transfer of the power and the security of the Northeast Asia, and then the security model is caused by the bilateral alliance. A series of security mechanisms, such as the Quartet, Japan, South Korea, the United States, the United States, the Coordination and Oversight Mechanism (TCOG) and the subsequent three-party talks, have emerged from the first nuclear crisis in North-East Asia. The mechanism of the Six-Party Talks has played a positive role in the second nuclear crisis, and has become an accepted solution to the nuclear issue. There are many other security issues, such as border dispute, energy, The issues of source security, financial security, etc. These security issues concern both traditional security and non-traditional security, with a single-party basis On the basis of improving the mechanism of the Six-Party Talks, it extends its function from the traditional security field to the non-traditional security field, making it a problem that can solve all the security of Northeast Asia The transition of the security model in North-East Asia is a long-term, gradual, It is an inevitable trend, but it is an inevitable trend. China will become a driver of this trend, and achieve the rise of China's peace through the process of all kinds of relations
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D831
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 周远;美日韩三角关系对东北亚安全机制构建的影响及我国的对策研究[D];山东建筑大学;2012年
2 万秋波;论冷战后东亚安全机制[D];上海师范大学;2012年
，本文编号：2494457
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2494457.html
