当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 文化论文 >

五四前后中国早期马克思主义者对西化派挑战的回应

发布时间:2018-05-20 13:07

  本文选题:五四时期 + 中国早期马克思主义者 ; 参考:《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年04期


【摘要】:应对不同时期、阶段其他社会思潮的挑战,是马克思主义中国化实践中必须要破解的问题情境之一。以五四前后为例,面对西化派的挑战,中国早期马克思主义者从多方面给予了积极性回应,如在历史观上,用唯物史观回应了西化派的历史进化论和文化决定论,初步回答了当时中国问题及其产生根源是什么的问题;在自由观上,用社会主义自由观回应了西化派资产阶级自由观,初步回答了当时中国问题如何解决以及向何处去的问题;在真理观上,用马克思主义真理观回应了西化派实用主义真理观,初步回答了马克思主义是否具有真理性的问题;在文化观上,用中西文化融合创新的观点回应了西化派的文化整体观和西方文化中心论,初步回答了中西文化如何处理以及是否需要以马克思主义为指导的问题。这些回应,既向当时的民众旗帜鲜明地传递了解决中国问题(包括中西文化的处理、社会意识形态格局的构建等方面)需要马克思主义以及它具有解决中国问题的能力和品质这样的信息;也在客观上为之后的中国马克思主义者提供了一种间接的警醒,即马克思主义中国化不是一帆风顺、一劳永逸的。
[Abstract]:To deal with the challenges of other social trends of thought in different periods is one of the problem situations that must be solved in the practice of Marxism in China. Taking the May 4th Movement as an example, in the face of the challenge of Westernization, early Chinese Marxists responded positively in many ways, such as historical materialism, historical evolution and cultural determinism. In the view of freedom, the socialist concept of freedom is used to respond to the Westernized bourgeoisie view of freedom, and the initial answer to the question of how to solve the Chinese problem and where to go at that time. In the view of truth, it responds to the pragmatic truth view of westernized school with Marxist truth view, and preliminarily answers the question whether Marxism has truth. In this paper, the author responds to the cultural holistic view of Westernization school and the western culture-centered theory with the view of the integration and innovation of Chinese and Western cultures, and answers the question of how to deal with Chinese and Western culture and whether Marxism should be the guide. These responses not only gave a clear-cut message to the people at that time to resolve the Chinese problem, including the handling of Chinese and Western cultures, The construction of social ideology) needs information such as Marxism and its ability and quality to solve China's problems. It also objectively provides an indirect warning to the Chinese Marxists after that. That is, Marxism in China is not plain sailing, once and for all.
【作者单位】: 淮北师范大学信息学院;上海师范大学知识与价值科学研究所;
【基金】:安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目“近现代中国化马克思主义与自由主义的思想论战研究”(gxyq ZD2016407) 安徽省高等教育振兴计划马克思主义理论学科领航建设项目“马克思主义基本原理”(Szzgjh2-6)
【分类号】:G02

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 姜們;重温文化历史 探讨改革新路——评介《五四前后东西文化问题论战文选》[J];w芸,

本文编号:1914733


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/1914733.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e3225***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com